From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109241437.53241.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7CC353.1050704@freescale.com>
On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>> Dear Stefano & Marek,
> >>>
> >>> can you please provide the requested information?
> >>
> >> Hi Scott,
> >>
> >>> In message <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>>> In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote:
> >>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice
> >>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board,
> >>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have
> >>>> an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted.
> >>
> >> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije:
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html
> >>
> >> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Stefano
> >
> > Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience
> > measure now. I don't need to for mx28.
>
> Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then.
Very well then, mind merging the rest then ?
Cheers
>
> -Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-24 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-12 4:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Random NAND fixes and improvements Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] NAND: Really ignore bad blocks when scrubbing Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 18:54 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] NAND: Add nand read.raw and write.raw commands Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:48 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-22 1:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V2] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-22 16:03 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-22 18:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V3] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-22 18:40 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-23 13:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V4] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 18:57 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:50 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 19:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-21 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 20:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-22 1:34 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-22 7:41 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-22 8:51 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-23 17:35 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-24 12:37 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-09-26 18:33 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-26 18:49 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] NAND: Make page, erase, oob size available via cmd_nand Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:55 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 19:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-22 1:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 V2] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 19:01 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 19:38 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 19:51 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 20:07 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 20:53 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 21:04 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 21:14 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add scrub.quiet command option Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 16:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-12 17:45 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 18:06 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:24 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 18:31 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:36 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 19:19 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 19:28 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 19:36 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 19:42 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 23:24 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-13 1:02 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 4:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-13 4:36 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:22 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-13 22:41 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:53 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-12 18:50 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 20:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-12 22:59 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add -y option to nand scrub command Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-27 19:03 ` Scott Wood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-08 20:39 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] Random NAND fixes and improvements Marek Vasut
2011-09-08 20:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109241437.53241.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox