From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:37:53 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation In-Reply-To: <4E7CC353.1050704@freescale.com> References: <1315800250-19761-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201109221051.33950.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <4E7CC353.1050704@freescale.com> Message-ID: <201109241437.53241.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >>> Dear Stefano & Marek, > >>> > >>> can you please provide the requested information? > >> > >> Hi Scott, > >> > >>> In message <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: > >>>>> In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote: > >>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice > >>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, > >>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. > >>>> > >>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have > >>>> an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. > >> > >> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html > >> > >> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Stefano > > > > Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience > > measure now. I don't need to for mx28. > > Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then. Very well then, mind merging the rest then ? Cheers > > -Scott