From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:37:01 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] GCC4.4: Squash multiple warnings due to strict
	aliasing
In-Reply-To: <20110926113041.E6E941407998@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1317002798-27112-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<201109261132.43616.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20110926113041.E6E941407998@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201109261937.01263.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Monday, September 26, 2011 01:30:41 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
> 
> In message <201109261132.43616.marek.vasut@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > > Would it be better to change the __arch_putb macro into an extern
> > > inline function instead which would catch these and future cases?
> > 
> > Yes, but you'll need to do that on a much larger scale. Is anyone up for
> > doing it ?
> 
> What exactly are the advantages, and what the disadvantages?
> 
> code size / memory footprint?

I assume converting those to inline function will yield no memory usage growth 
at all.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk