From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:43:27 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 1/4] usb: Move ehci.h and ehci-core.h to include/usb directory In-Reply-To: References: <1317221946-18252-1-git-send-email-fermata7@gmail.com> <201109282236.17496.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201109282343.27196.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:10:50 PM Jana Rapava wrote: > 2011/9/28 Marek Vasut > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes for v1: > > > - reorder patches in patchset > > > - use patch from Fabio Estevam > > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > - fix From field > > > - rebase on top of u-boot-imx/next(no actual changes) > > > > > > Changes for v3: > > > - change versioning in changelog from per patchset to per patch > > > - no actual changes > > > > > > Changes for v4: > > > - no changes > > > > > > Changes for v5: > > > - no changes > > > > What the hell ... the patch is V9, but changelog ends with V5 ... well > > what the > > hell. > > When I started to use in changelog versioning per-patch, I didn't change > the versioning in subjects, because I was afraid it would mess up with > previous patches, which had the same version number. > But I can repost the patchset with proper version numbers if you want. Can you repost the whole series with proper cover letter explaining you're burying this mess and all ? Start versioning from V1 then. Thanks > > > So please, if you submit a series and then update only SOME patches, you > > have to > > send only the updated patches. And the email in-reply-to should be set > > per-patch > > to it's predecesor. > > Ok. > Regards, > Jana Rapava