From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 01:35:30 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Allow user to disable CPU support
	library
In-Reply-To: <4E8DCF29.6020903@freescale.com>
References: <1315800204-19705-3-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<1317860006-18212-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<4E8DCF29.6020903@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <201110070135.31051.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday, October 06, 2011 05:54:17 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
> > support library. This can be useful on some setups.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> > Cc: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
> > Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  spl/Makefile |    5 +++++
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile
> > index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644
> > --- a/spl/Makefile
> > +++ b/spl/Makefile
> > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
> > 
> >  CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y
> >  export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> > 
> > +# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this:
> > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE
> > +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE
> > +endif
> 
> Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that
> subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)?
> 
> Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes
> autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol?
> 
> -Scott

Right, you can ignore this patch and apply only 2/2.

Cheers