From: Jason <u-boot@lakedaemon.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Ready for -rc2?
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:16:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111014201624.GH7102@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E989366.1080608@aribaud.net>
Albert,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Le 29/09/2011 22:05, Jason a ?crit :
> >Albert, Prafulla,
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote:
> >>>Albert, Prafulla,
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>>>In message<20110920215703.GB7734@titan.lakedaemon.net> you wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>>>>>Hello everybody,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date
> >>>>>>any further), or are there any important fixes still missing?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the
> >>>>>merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>[PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support.
> >>>>>http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a
> >>>>>MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it
> >>>>>settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Please? :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert)
> >>>>to apply and send pull requests.
> >>>
> >>>Any hope of making 2011.09?
> >>>
> >>>thx,
> >>>
> >>>Jason.
> >>
> >>Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in
> >>u-boot-marvell ATM.
> >>
> >>Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it
> >>up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he
> >>prefers).
> >
> >Looks like it didn't make it. So, I've rebased it against v2011.09 and
> >did a quick test. There's really no significant changes. Should I roll
> >a v9 for the rebase? I'm inclined to think it's unnecessary...
> >
> >thx,
> >
> >Jason.
>
> It still applies cleanly onto the current u-boot-arm/master.
>
> Prafulla, do you mind if I take it?
Prafulla has already pulled it into his tree, I imagine it will be in
his next pull request.
thx,
Jason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 20:17 [U-Boot] [STATUS] Ready for -rc2? Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-20 20:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-21 21:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-20 20:41 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-09-21 21:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-22 1:22 ` 馬克泡
2011-09-20 21:57 ` Jason
2011-09-21 21:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-21 21:34 ` Jason
2011-09-28 6:42 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-09-29 20:05 ` Jason
2011-10-14 19:54 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-10-14 20:16 ` Jason [this message]
2011-09-28 6:55 ` Graeme Russ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111014201624.GH7102@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=u-boot@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox