* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
@ 2011-10-28 18:00 Albert ARIBAUD
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2011-10-28 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello all,
Recently the ARM mach-types.h file has been brought in sync with its
Linux original, leasing to a number of boards not being listed any more,
as the new list only contains boards which have actual Linux support or
were declared less than one year ago.
The symptom is a build failure with a message of the form "error:
'MACH_TYPE_XXXXXX' undeclared (first use in this function)".
U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a
patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XXXXXX definition in their boards'
config header file in include/configs/.
Note that three boards do not have a maintainer and will be removed if
nobody steps forward to take over their maintainership. They have been
listed below as ORPHAN, and since they are all PXA boards, I have CC:ed
Marek just in case.
Here is the list of broken boards (BTW: how about putting maintainer
identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format
more easily parseable?)
-------------------------
Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
gplugd ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC)
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@comelit.it>
dig297 ARM ARMV7 (OMAP3530 SoC)
Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@faraday-tech.com>
a320evb FA526 (ARM920T-like) (a320 SoC)
Daniel Gorsulowski <daniel.gorsulowski@esd.eu>
meesc ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC)
otc570 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC)
Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>
PM9261 AT91SAM9261
PM9263 AT91SAM9263
PM9G45 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G45 SoC)
Prakash Kumar <prakash@embedx.com>
cerf250 xscale/pxa
Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
km_kirkwood ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
portl2 ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
David M?ller <d.mueller@elsoft.ch>
VCMA9 ARM920T
Jens Scharsig <esw@bus-elektronik.de>
eb_cpux9k2 ARM920T (AT91RM9200 SoC)
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
mgcoge3un ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
csb226 xscale/pxa
innokom xscale/pxa
Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>
sbc35_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC)
tny_a9260 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9260 SoC)
tny_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC)
Matthias Weisser <weisserm@arcor.de>
jadecpu ARM926EJS (MB86R01 SoC)
ORPHAN:
cradle xscale/pxa
pleb2 xscale/pxa
xm250 xscale/pxa
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
2011-10-28 18:00 [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update Albert ARIBAUD
@ 2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
2011-10-28 21:22 ` Robert Schwebel
2011-10-28 23:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-28 23:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-05 8:25 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2011-10-28 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Albert,
> Hello all,
>
> Recently the ARM mach-types.h file has been brought in sync with its
> Linux original, leasing to a number of boards not being listed any more,
> as the new list only contains boards which have actual Linux support or
> were declared less than one year ago.
>
> The symptom is a build failure with a message of the form "error:
> 'MACH_TYPE_XXXXXX' undeclared (first use in this function)".
>
> U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a
> patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XXXXXX definition in their boards'
> config header file in include/configs/.
>
> Note that three boards do not have a maintainer and will be removed if
> nobody steps forward to take over their maintainership. They have been
> listed below as ORPHAN, and since they are all PXA boards, I have CC:ed
> Marek just in case.
>
> Here is the list of broken boards (BTW: how about putting maintainer
> identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format
> more easily parseable?)
>
> -------------------------
>
> Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
>
> gplugd ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC)
Ajay, you have warnings in your damn ethernet code !!! Have you ever tested it
?!
>
> Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@comelit.it>
>
> dig297 ARM ARMV7 (OMAP3530 SoC)
>
> Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@faraday-tech.com>
>
> a320evb FA526 (ARM920T-like) (a320 SoC)
>
> Daniel Gorsulowski <daniel.gorsulowski@esd.eu>
>
> meesc ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC)
> otc570 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC)
>
> Ilko Iliev <iliev@ronetix.at>
>
> PM9261 AT91SAM9261
> PM9263 AT91SAM9263
> PM9G45 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G45 SoC)
>
> Prakash Kumar <prakash@embedx.com>
>
> cerf250 xscale/pxa
Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for longer time to
fix.
>
> Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
>
> km_kirkwood ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
> portl2 ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
>
> David M?ller <d.mueller@elsoft.ch>
>
> VCMA9 ARM920T
>
> Jens Scharsig <esw@bus-elektronik.de>
>
> eb_cpux9k2 ARM920T (AT91RM9200 SoC)
>
> Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>
> mgcoge3un ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC)
>
> Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
>
> csb226 xscale/pxa
> innokom xscale/pxa
Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for longer time to
fix. (here I have some feeling it's not gonna be fixed)
>
> Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>
>
> sbc35_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC)
> tny_a9260 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9260 SoC)
> tny_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC)
>
> Matthias Weisser <weisserm@arcor.de>
>
> jadecpu ARM926EJS (MB86R01 SoC)
>
> ORPHAN:
>
> cradle xscale/pxa
> pleb2 xscale/pxa
> xm250 xscale/pxa
Drop, sorry.
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2011-10-28 21:22 ` Robert Schwebel
2011-10-28 23:18 ` Mike Frysinger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2011-10-28 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > csb226 xscale/pxa
> > innokom xscale/pxa
>
> Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for
> longer time to fix. (here I have some feeling it's not gonna be fixed)
They won't. Both boards are not in my hands any more and long obsolete.
So from my side, dropping them is just fine.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
2011-10-28 21:22 ` Robert Schwebel
@ 2011-10-28 23:18 ` Mike Frysinger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-10-28 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 23:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Here is the list of broken boards
>>
>> Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? gplugd ? ? ? ? ?ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC)
>
> Ajay, you have warnings in your damn ethernet code !!! Have you ever tested it
> ?!
let's be a little more accommodating from the get-go and assume that
they have, and that something has changed in parallel
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
2011-10-28 18:00 [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update Albert ARIBAUD
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2011-10-28 23:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-05 8:25 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-10-28 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 20:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> (BTW: how about putting maintainer
> identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format
> more easily parseable?)
having a MAINTAINERS file that is compatible in syntax with the Linux
kernel is nice, but i guess boards.cfg does make sense in the u-boot
context in that it's a single db of board info. perhaps we could have
it list aliases though and then we could maintain a muttrc compatible
file which binds aliases to e-mails/names so we could directly
leverage it from .git/mailrc ?
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
2011-10-28 18:00 [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update Albert ARIBAUD
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
2011-10-28 23:20 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-11-05 8:25 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" @ 2011-11-05 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Albert
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a
> patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XXXXXX definition in their boards'
> config header file in include/configs/.
Could you please apply the following patches:
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122787/
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122786/
Thank you
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-05 8:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-28 18:00 [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update Albert ARIBAUD
2011-10-28 21:10 ` Marek Vasut
2011-10-28 21:22 ` Robert Schwebel
2011-10-28 23:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-28 23:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-05 8:25 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox