From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:52:24 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] image: Allow images to indicate they're
	loadable at any address
In-Reply-To: <20111108115053.3ED0413BE0C1@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1320164902-24190-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
	<201111081235.05464.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20111108115053.3ED0413BE0C1@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201111081252.24817.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Dear Marek Vasut,
> 
> In message <201111081235.05464.marek.vasut@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > Ok, so guys ... let me ask a stupid question:
> Not a stupid question at all.
> 
> > Will it be a problem to extend bootm (if not already done) to load
> > zImages directly, with -z option for example ? Won't that satisty both
> > parties --
> 
> bootm is for uImage format.  I see no sense in "extending" it.
> 
> I already suggested to add a new command ("bootz" ?) that could be
> used to boot zImage files.

I saw that just now. I'd vote for the "bootz" solution. That way, everyone will 
be happy and this flame would be over.

M