From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:24:52 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Do no use reparm as it break libgcc linkage In-Reply-To: References: <1320834779-15460-1-git-send-email-graeme.russ@gmail.com> <201111110005.00044.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <201111111124.54077.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday 11 November 2011 00:16:47 Graeme Russ wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i can't think of any calls off the top of my head which would result in > > invoking a func in libgcc.a. > > Any function listed here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Libgcc.html > > But we can discount any float/double routines, exception handling and > split stack which leaves just: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Integer-library-routines.html yes, and pretty much all of those are emitted implicitly due to math operations (64bit divs/mults/etc...), or explicitly when the user does __builtin_xxx() (and use of __builtin_xxx is not affected by -fno-builtins). none of those that i can see would come via a C library call that gcc would implicitly rewrite. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20111111/594c08d2/attachment.pgp