From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:14:16 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h
In-Reply-To: <201111131734.09114.michael@walle.cc>
References: <201111130058.43026.michael@walle.cc>
	<201111131718.27328.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<201111131734.09114.michael@walle.cc>
Message-ID: <201111131814.16555.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 17:18:27 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > > >  - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline
> > > > >  linux,
> > > > >  
> > > > >    too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay
> > > > >    in this file.
> > > > 
> > > > No, you can define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_SOMETHING and
> > > > MACH_TYPE_SOMETHING nnn in your config file.
> > > 
> > > well, according to this argumentation, there would be no need for
> > > mach-types.h at all. because if you rely on a mach-types.h definition
> > > and it is removed from linux, you have to switch to define it yourself
> > > anyway.
> > 
> > Not really, if you don't use it to boot linux, you don't need the mach
> > id. Or if you use dtree.
> 
> so why should i use the mach-type.h anyway? instead i could just define the
> id in the config.
> 
> either there is a database, where the ids come from (and this database must
> not follow the linux policies) or there is no database and every board
> defines the numerical id (of couse they must match the linux mach ids.)
> 
> what about boards which switch from mach-ids to DT in linux? Just don't
> support mach-ids for these anymore and not being able to boot older
> kernels?

Why would the machine ID be removed from mach-types.h is the machine switched to 
DT ?