From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:07:36 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post: fix compile issue for post tests on kirkwood In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201111270807.36629.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marek.vasut at gmail.com] > > Sent: 26 November 2011 17:15 > > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin at theia.denx.de; Longchamp; Heiko > > Schocher; Holger Brunck > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post: fix compile issue for post tests on > > kirkwood > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marek.vasut at gmail.com] > > > > Sent: 25 November 2011 14:52 > > > > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > > > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin at theia.denx.de; Longchamp; Heiko > > > > Schocher; Holger Brunck > > > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post: fix compile issue for post tests > > > > on > > > > > > kirkwood > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot- > > > > > > > > bounces at lists.denx.de] > > > > > > > > > > On Behalf Of Marek Vasut > > > > > > Sent: 25 November 2011 14:22 > > > > > > To: u-boot at lists.denx.de > > > > > > Cc: Valentin at theia.denx.de; Longchamp; Heiko Schocher; Holger > > > > Brunck > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post: fix compile issue for post > > > > tests > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > kirkwood > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit f31a911fe (arm, post: add missing post_time_ms for arm) > > > > > > > enables get_ticks and get_tbclk for all arm based boards, > > > > > > > but kirkwood has currently no implementation for this. So > > > > > > > undefine this for kirkwood boards. > > > > > > > > > > > > So this means the kirkwood timer doesn't conform to current timer > > > > > > api? Why work > > > > > > it around and not fix it then? > > > > > > > > > > I think this is better approach > > > > > > > > Right? :) So now the question is ... who's gonna do it ? ;-) > > > > > > Patch from any one is welcomed. :-D > > > > Anyone, eh? Anyone ... anyone like the maintainer maybe ? >:-D > > I would have loved to do it, but I am very busy with some other very > important assignment. May be I will post a patch in feb2012 > I'll keep an eye on this ;-)