[U-Boot] what to do when the uboot can not mark the phisical bad block of nand flash?

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

> The boot version is 1.3.1. So how the Nand erase mark the bad block into
> BBT in the software?

Ok, please:
1) Stop top-pasting replied
2) Use mainline u-boot or something not prehistoric. please!

M
> 
> 
> ? 2011-11-26 19:43:40?"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com> ???
> 
> >> OK?guys,I can discribe this question in the other way.
> >> When I download the program image to the nand flash in the uboot.
> >> At firist, I need to erase the nand flash by running the command of
> >> "nand erase" or "nand scrub" in the cmdline. But sometimes this step
> >> will be failed because one block of this flash is bad, and this command
> >> will return "Failed erase".
> >
> >Scrub wont, but it's stupid to use. Nand erase should mark the block bad
> >into BBT. Anyway, what version of uboot do you use?
> >
> >> Guys what would you do when you got this problem? Do I need to mrak this
> >> block as bad block and add it to the bad block table with  software? how
> >> to do this ? Thank you !
> >> 
> >> At 2011-11-25 16:51:17,"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hi, guys                I got a problem. I move a part of source code
> >> >> of linux/driver/mtd/nand to the u-boot. But I found that the u-boot
> >> >> can not mark the phsical bad block . when I run nand_erase() or
> >> >> nand_scrub(), it return error num as below:
> >> >> linux/driver/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2589            chip->erase_cmd(mtd, page & chip->pagemask);
> >> >>     2590
> >> >>     
> >> >>               status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip); 2592
> >> >>               /*
> >> >>     
> >> >>     2593                 * See if operation failed and additional
> >> >>     status
> >> >> 
> >> >> checks are 2594                 * available
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2595                 */
> >> >>     2596                 if ((status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) &&
> >> >> 
> >> >> (chip->errstat)) 2597                         status =
> >> >> chip->errstat(mtd, chip, FL_ERASING, 2598
> >> >> status, page); 2600                 /* See if block erase succeeded
> >> >> */
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2601                 if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> >> >>     2602                         DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Failed
> >> >>     erase,
> >> >> 
> >> >> " 2603                                         "page 0x%08x\n",
> >> >> __func__, page); 2604                         instr->state =
> >> >> MTD_ERASE_FAILED;
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2605                         instr->fail_addr =
> >> >>     2606                                 ((loff_t)page <<
> >> >> 
> >> >> chip->page_shift); 2607                         goto erase_exit;
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2608                 }
> >> >>     
> >> >>         you can find that if block erase is failed(status==-1), it
> >> >>         only
> >> >> 
> >> >> mark the instr(we will not use the instr later), and go to the
> >> >> erase_exit. So there is no code to mark the oob of the phisical bad
> >> >> block, neither add it to the bad block table. so ,I add the code of
> >> >> writing oob of the phisical bad block when it is erased failed, such
> >> >> as below:
> >> >> chip->erase_cmd(mtd, page & chip->pagemask);2589
> >> >> 
> >> >> - Ignored:
> >> >>     2590                 status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
> >> >>     2592                 /*
> >> >>     2593                 * See if operation failed and additional
> >> >>     status
> >> >> 
> >> >> checks are 2594                 * available
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2595                 */
> >> >>     2596                 if ((status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) &&
> >> >> 
> >> >> (chip->errstat)) 2597                         status =
> >> >> chip->errstat(mtd, chip, FL_ERASING, 2598
> >> >> status, page); 2600                 /* See if block erase succeeded
> >> >> */
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2601                 if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> >> >>     2602                         DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Failed
> >> >>     erase,
> >> >> 
> >> >> " 2603                                         "page 0x%08x\n",
> >> >> __func__, page); 2604                         instr->state =
> >> >> MTD_ERASE_FAILED;
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2605                         instr->fail_addr =
> >> >>     2606                                 ((loff_t)page <<
> >> >> 
> >> >> chip->page_shift); nand_write_oob(addr);
> >> >> 
> >> >>     2607                         goto erase_exit;
> >> >>     2608                 }
> >> >>     
> >> >>        Guys, what do you think of it , and what would you to if you 
> >> >>        got
> >> >> 
> >> >> this problem.
> >> >
> >> >Can you please fix your mailer and send this stuff again? It's really
> >> >hard to decode what you're asking please.
> >> >
> >> >M