public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/7] reboard: define CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD everywhere
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:19:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111291819.22994.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ09Np5hksxZBkiqer9WBzE8xycMp-tEGuhs_2_=rS0eWw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:09:19 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:08:09 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Monday 21 November 2011 18:57:54 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> >> We are introducing a new unified board setup and we want this to
> >> >> be the default. So we need to opt all architectures out first.
> >> > 
> >> > the define says "BOARD", so shouldn't it be in board configs ?  we can
> >> > do that easily: add it to include/config_defaults.h.  then boards
> >> > that opt into it will #undef it in their own configs.
> >> 
> >> Thanks for looking at this.
> >> 
> >> I see this as an architecture feature - perhaps a rename to something
> >> like CONFIG_LEGACY_ARCH would help? I quite badly want to avoid moving
> >> boards over one at a time, or having boards for a particular
> >> architecture that still do things the old way - it just increases
> >> maintenance and means that my eventual patch to remove
> >> arch/xxx/lib/board.c cannot be applied.
> >> 
> >> My idea for this CONFIG is purely as a temporary measure before boards
> >> more over to the generic approach.
> > 
> > how about we have the reloc code live in lib/reloc/ and be controlled by
> > CONFIG_LEGACY_ARCH_RELOC ?
> 
> My only concern is that if something like SPL needs to keep all the
> early code at the start of the image. I personally don't like the
> current method for doing that (would prefer a distinctive .text.early
> section name) and I don't believe that any SPL implementation actually
> relocates itself.

not sure why this matters ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20111129/f792386e/attachment.pgp>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 23:57 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/7] reboard: Introduce generic relocation feature Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/7] reboard: define CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD everywhere Simon Glass
2011-11-29  3:11   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-29 20:08     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-29 21:40       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-29 22:09         ` Simon Glass
2011-11-29 23:19           ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2011-11-29 23:40             ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07  8:15               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-12-07 16:28                 ` Simon Glass
2011-12-05  6:42           ` Aneesh V
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/7] reboard: Add generic link symbols Simon Glass
2011-11-29  2:59   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-07 22:37     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/7] reboard: Add generic relocation feature Simon Glass
2011-11-29  3:07   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-29 22:15     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-29 23:00       ` Graeme Russ
2011-11-29 23:20       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-29 23:41         ` Simon Glass
2011-11-29 23:49           ` Graeme Russ
2011-11-30  2:58             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-07  7:38               ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-12-08  0:35                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-09  3:36                   ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07 22:45     ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07 22:54       ` Graeme Russ
2011-12-07 22:55         ` Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/7] reboard: arm: Add relocation function Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/7] reboard: arm: Add processor function library Simon Glass
2011-11-29  3:12   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-07  7:44   ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-12-07 16:24     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:57 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 6/7] reboard: arm: Move over to generic relocation Simon Glass
2011-11-29  3:14   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-09  3:41     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-21 23:58 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 7/7] reboard: arm: Remove unused code in start.S Simon Glass
2011-11-29  3:15   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-09  3:42     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-28 23:45 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/7] reboard: Introduce generic relocation feature Tom Rini
2011-12-07  1:56   ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07  2:56     ` Graeme Russ
2011-12-07  3:25       ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07  3:36         ` Graeme Russ
2011-12-07 23:29   ` Simon Glass
2011-12-07  8:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-12-09  3:34   ` Simon Glass

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201111291819.22994.vapier@gentoo.org \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox