[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: Change board_mmc_getcd() signature.

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

> * Marek Vasut wrote:
> > By "signature" you mean signedness ?
> 
> No, I mean "signature" as synonymous to "function prototype".

Please say so then, it was slightly confusing.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > -int board_mmc_getcd(u8 *absent, struct mmc *mmc)
> > > +int board_mmc_getcd(struct mmc *mmc)
> > > 
> > >  {
> > >  
> > >  	struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg = (struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *)mmc->priv;
> > >  	uint32_t cd = efika_mmc_cd();
> > >  	
> > >  	if (cfg->esdhc_base == MMC_SDHC1_BASE_ADDR)
> > > 
> > > -		*absent = gpio_get_value(IOMUX_TO_GPIO(cd));
> > > -	else
> > > -		*absent = gpio_get_value(IOMUX_TO_GPIO(MX51_PIN_GPIO1_8));
> > > +		return !gpio_get_value(IOMUX_TO_GPIO(cd));
> > > 
> > > -	return 0;
> > > +	return !gpio_get_value(IOMUX_TO_GPIO(MX51_PIN_GPIO1_8));
> > 
> > int ret;
> > 
> > if (cfg->...)
> > 
> >   ret = ...
> > 
> > else
> > 
> >   ret = ...
> > 
> > return ret;
> 
> That'll require an extra variable and will actually be longer. I don't see
> any advantage in converting it.

It's slightly more readable IMO, but that's a matter of personal taste so I'd 
like others to comment on this one.

> 
> > DTTO here please, also add spaces into the comment ... /* GPIO1_4 */
> 
> I was going to keep that as it was, but I guess since I'm already changing
> the line I can as well clean it up.
> 
> Thierry

Thanks!

M