From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:17:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112121117.49932.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112120045.39688.vapier@gentoo.org>
> On Sunday 11 December 2011 08:42:07 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:09:30 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > Introduce ne2k_register_io(in, out), which allows user to supply two
> > > > functions. One for reading data from the card, the other for writing
> > > > data to the card. Then introduce drivers' private data, which carry
> > > > pointers to these functions and are passed throughout the driver.
> > >
> > > where are the users of this new API ? as it stands, i just see bloat.
> > > every register access is now an indirect function call ? what's the
> > > point
> >
> > Go to ... drivers/net/ax88796.h ... and check how it's done now. It's
> > just wrong. Now for .03 release I have pxa3xx support ready which uses
> > just this chip and adding more sh^Htuff to that fill would be even worse
> > bloat.
>
> i agree, that code is terrible. however, those code paths can be trivially
> merged without the proposed bloat yours brings in.
So what's your suggested awesome clean solution?
> further, that code base
> isn't even used by the ne2000 driver.
What are you talking about, did you even bother to look?
>
> so again, the question stands: what exactly do you need to do different ?
> looks to me like the DP_* macros should get punted in favor of io.h
> accessors, and the register offsets rewritten into C structs.
Sure, but not every hardware accesses the registers the same way. So I'm open
for your suggestions on how to do it properly, apparently you have much better
idea up your sleeve.
M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-11 1:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors Marek Vasut
2011-12-11 1:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] NET: NE2000: Hide dp83902a_priv_data_t into ne2k_private_data Marek Vasut
2011-12-11 7:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors Mike Frysinger
2011-12-11 13:42 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-12 5:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-12 10:17 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-12-16 17:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-16 18:13 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-16 19:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-16 20:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-10 21:41 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-07-13 10:50 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112121117.49932.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox