From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:32:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112161432.54362.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112161913.33530.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
On Friday 16 December 2011 13:13:33 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday 16 December 2011 12:33:53 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > rename ISA_OFFSET to CONFIG_NE2000_IO_OFFSET, then move the "2" to
> > CONFIG_NE2000_IO_STRIDE, and move them both to the board config header.
> > then you get one unified set:
> >
> > #define DP_IN(_b_, _o_, _d_) \
> > (_d_) = readw((void *)((_b_) + ((_o_) * CONFIG_NE2000_IO_STRIDE) + \
> > CONFIG_NE2000_IO_OFFSET));
> > etc...
> >
> > if you really wanted to clean up the driver, the DP_XXX funcs would get
> > turned into C code as static inline helpers, and the base + register
> > offset would get turned into a C struct.
>
> Ok, so if you had two different piece of hardware that had different
> NE2000_IO_OFFSET and STRIDE, running the same u-boot, how'd you handle it ?
do you actually have this issue ? there are plenty of theoretical situations
like this which would break a significant number (majority?) of drivers in the
tree. so unless this is a real case, i'd ignore it for now and stick with
what optimizes away to no overhead.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20111216/30ced049/attachment.pgp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-11 1:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors Marek Vasut
2011-12-11 1:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] NET: NE2000: Hide dp83902a_priv_data_t into ne2k_private_data Marek Vasut
2011-12-11 7:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NET: NE2000: Cleanup IO accessors Mike Frysinger
2011-12-11 13:42 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-12 5:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-12 10:17 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-16 17:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-16 18:13 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-16 19:32 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2011-12-16 20:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-10 21:41 ` Joe Hershberger
2012-07-13 10:50 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112161432.54362.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox