From: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] overo: add SPL support
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:39:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112201339.39460.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111220120607.DFE65131B071@gemini.denx.de>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 01:06:07 PM you wrote:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> In message <201112201253.46991.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> you wrote:
> > I agree to your concerns but - as I understood Steve Sakoman - here the
>
> > situation is slightly different:
> I think you misunderstand.
Yes I think too :-)
>
> > At elder overo boards TWL4030 RTC irq is connected to gpio112.
> > Unfortunately this pin is also used for binary revision detection.
> > Therefore we need to send 'shut-up' to TWL4030 via i2c to avoid reading
> > wrong revision. In SPL this must be done *before* SDRAM (timing) is set
> > up, because the type of SDRAM is revision dependent.
>
> My suggestion was to check if memory initialization can not rather be
> done _without_ reading (and without otherwise knowing) the board type
> or revision. Usually this is possible, and I always prefer such
> auto-adjusting solutions over hard-wired approaches that break down
> when any of the expected inout data is not correct or not available.
>
Dear Wolfgang,
I don't know if I want to jump also into these changes now - especially since
I am quite new here..
But for my intererst - since it seems more error tolerant: How is SDRAM timing
set up without exactly knowing what type is connected? Is there a good example
implementation in u-boot(-spl)?
Best regards
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 14:34 [U-Boot] [PATCH] overo: add SPL support Andreas Müller
2011-12-15 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-15 21:12 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 1:03 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 1:08 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-20 1:15 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 5:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 5:45 ` Tom Rini
2011-12-20 11:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 11:53 ` Andreas Müller
2011-12-20 12:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 12:39 ` Andreas Müller [this message]
2011-12-20 16:36 ` Aneesh V
2011-12-20 21:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-20 12:20 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-12-20 13:55 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-12-21 1:00 ` Andreas Müller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-14 16:27 Andreas Müller
2011-12-14 17:24 ` Steve Sakoman
2011-12-14 23:00 ` Andreas Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112201339.39460.schnitzeltony@gmx.de \
--to=schnitzeltony@gmx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox