From: Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Changes to move hawkboard to the new infrastructure.
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:12:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120110084231.GC7838@Hardy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABkLObpJn33_bVsa+A3E_+0Q6ZXqUJ=7wHZ72tGCqAHENF-GNA@mail.gmail.com>
hi Christian,
On Tue Jan 10, 2012 at 09:15:14AM +0100, Christian Riesch wrote:
> Hi Sughosh and Tom,
>
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon Jan 09, 2012 at 04:30:56PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2012 11:28 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile
> >> > @@ -38,8 +38,11 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC) += lxt972.o
> dp83848.o et1011c.o ksz8873.o
> >> >
> >> > ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> >> > COBJS-y += spl.o
> >> > -COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DM365) += dm365_lowlevel.o
> >> > -COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX) += da850_lowlevel.o
> >> > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DM365_SPL) += dm365_lowlevel.o
> >> > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DM365_SPL) += dm365_spl.o
> >> > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DA850EVM_SPL) += da850_lowlevel.o
> >> > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DA850EVM_SPL) += da850_spl.o
> >> > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAWKBOARD_SPL) += hawkboard_nand_spl.o
> >> > endif
> >>
> >> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD means we'll only do this on the SPL build, not the
> >> normal build, and we already have symbols for the board and the SoC so
> >> we shouldn't need any new CONFIG symbols here, I'm pretty sure.
> >
> > The problem here is that both da850evm and hawkboard define the
> > CONFIG_SOC_DA850, and CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX, as the hawkboard shares code
> > like pinmux with the da850.
> >
> > I see a CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_* like define in da850evm.h and
> > hawkboard.h. Should i add a similar define for cam_enc_4xx, and use
> > these instead.
>
> Actually the problem is that now we have a board specific file
> (hawkboard_nand_spl.c) in the arch tree. Hawkboard has a DA850 SoC so if we
> have a da850_spl.c hawkboard should either use it as well, or we make the
> *spl.c files board specific and put them into the board tree.
I'd vote for moving the *spl.c files to their corresponding board
directories -- infact hawkboard_nand_spl.c was earlier under it's
board directory. This i think keeps the implementation clean, avoids
the risk of breakage, and also makes it simpler for any newer board
in the same soc family migrating to spl, which i think might
increase the ifdeffery.
Maybe Tom and Heiko can comment on how it can be done, and i'll take
the route of the majority :).
-sughosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 18:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Changes to move hawkboard to the new infrastructure Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-09 23:30 ` Tom Rini
2012-01-10 6:30 ` Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-10 8:15 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-10 8:42 ` Sughosh Ganu [this message]
2012-01-10 9:42 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-10 10:13 ` Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-10 18:15 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] Changes to move hawkboard to the new spl infrastructure Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-11 6:52 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-11 7:53 ` Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-11 8:54 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-11 9:17 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-11 9:40 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-11 14:37 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V3] " Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-11 16:10 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-11 17:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V4] " Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-12 7:24 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-12 7:30 ` Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-12 7:32 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-12 9:02 ` Christian Riesch
2012-01-12 9:39 ` Sughosh Ganu
2012-01-12 11:19 ` Christian Riesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120110084231.GC7838@Hardy \
--to=urwithsughosh@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox