From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:46:06 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ehci-omap: Clean up added ehci-omap.c In-Reply-To: References: <1325840641-26580-1-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> <201201111152.17861.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201201111346.06918.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Hi Marek, > >> > >> Thanks for you review. > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> From: "Govindraj.R" > >> >> > >> >> Clean up added ehci-omap.c and make it generic for re-use across > >> >> soc having same ehci ip block. Also pass the modes to be configured > >> >> and configure the ports accordingly. All usb layers are not cache > >> >> aligned till then keep cache off for usb ops as ehci will use > >> >> internally dma for all usb ops. > >> >> > >> >> * Add a generic common header ehci-omap.h having common ip block > >> >> data and reg shifts. > >> >> * Rename and modify ehci-omap3 to ehci.h retain only conflicting > >> >> sysc reg shifts remove others and move to common header file. > >> > > >> > Don't reimplement the ulpi stuff ... there's already some ulpi stuff > >> > in uboot that needs fixing, so fix it and use it. > >> > >> I am not implementing any ulpi stuff I am just configuring OMAP on > >> soc usb host controller (ehci). All the configuration stuff > >> is OMAP specific things which are done in ehci-omap.c file > >> > >> stuffs done are like soft-reset, port mode to be used and putting > >> port in no -idle mode(omap specific pm implementation) etc. > > > > This stuff: > > > > +/* ULPI */ > > +#define ULPI_SET(a) (a + 1) > > +#define ULPI_CLR(a) (a + 2) > > +#define ULPI_FUNC_CTRL 0x04 > > +#define ULPI_FUNC_CTRL_RESET (1 << 5) > > > > is just accidentally conforming to ULPI spec? > > These are for configuring INSNREG05_ULPI reg in EHCI reg map > of omap while configuring in ulpi-phy mode. > > looking into struct ulpi_regs {..} > then it doesn't map this configuration. Can you point me to some documentation about this please? It's not that I don't trust you, I'd rather prefer to avoid unnecessary duplication. > > btw, > IIUC that ulpi_regs struct is for otg transceiver that uses a ulpi phy chip > for communication. > > > M > > > btw. somewhere in the patch is one more asterisk at the end of line: > Will check that It was on the line I pointed out > > -- > Thanks, > Govindraj.R