From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:28:34 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ehci-omap: Clean up added ehci-omap.c In-Reply-To: References: <1325840641-26580-1-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> <201201111346.06918.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201201111428.34635.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> Hi Marek, > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for you review. > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> >> From: "Govindraj.R" > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Clean up added ehci-omap.c and make it generic for re-use across > >> >> >> soc having same ehci ip block. Also pass the modes to be > >> >> >> configured and configure the ports accordingly. All usb layers > >> >> >> are not cache aligned till then keep cache off for usb ops as > >> >> >> ehci will use internally dma for all usb ops. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> * Add a generic common header ehci-omap.h having common ip block > >> >> >> data and reg shifts. > >> >> >> * Rename and modify ehci-omap3 to ehci.h retain only conflicting > >> >> >> sysc reg shifts remove others and move to common header file. > >> >> > > >> >> > Don't reimplement the ulpi stuff ... there's already some ulpi > >> >> > stuff in uboot that needs fixing, so fix it and use it. > >> >> > >> >> I am not implementing any ulpi stuff I am just configuring OMAP on > >> >> soc usb host controller (ehci). All the configuration stuff > >> >> is OMAP specific things which are done in ehci-omap.c file > >> >> > >> >> stuffs done are like soft-reset, port mode to be used and putting > >> >> port in no -idle mode(omap specific pm implementation) etc. > >> > > >> > This stuff: > >> > > >> > +/* ULPI */ > >> > +#define ULPI_SET(a) (a + 1) > >> > +#define ULPI_CLR(a) (a + 2) > >> > +#define ULPI_FUNC_CTRL 0x04 > >> > +#define ULPI_FUNC_CTRL_RESET (1 << 5) > >> > > >> > is just accidentally conforming to ULPI spec? > >> > >> These are for configuring INSNREG05_ULPI reg in EHCI reg map > >> of omap while configuring in ulpi-phy mode. > >> > >> looking into struct ulpi_regs {..} > >> then it doesn't map this configuration. > > > > Can you point me to some documentation about this please? It's not that I > > don't trust you, I'd rather prefer to avoid unnecessary duplication. > > Yes that would be fine. > > You can download the omap4460 public trm from here: > > http://www.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/OMAP4460_ES.1x_PUBLIC_TRM_vM.zip > > Go to chapter 23.11.6.6.1 EHCI Register Summary > (page number 5171 and 5186/87) Sure, but the macro above looks more like 23.11.6.3, doesn't it ? And for that purpose, the struct ulpi_regs is fitting ok. Actually ... can you check the ulpi_read and ulpi_write stuff that's already in u-boot and explain why they can not be used with this port? M > > click INSNREG05_ULPI > > this for configuring in ulpi mode for external ulpi phy. > reference > chapter 23.11.4.1 refer to Figure 23-252. HS USB Host Controller > Architecture (page number 5096) > > >> btw, > >> IIUC that ulpi_regs struct is for otg transceiver that uses a ulpi phy > >> chip for communication. > >> > >> > M > >> > >> > btw. somewhere in the patch is one more asterisk at the end of line: > >> Will check that > > > > It was on the line I pointed out > > okay, got it. > > -- > Thanks, > Govindraj.R