From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:13:41 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] arm926: Flush the data cache before
	disabling it.
In-Reply-To: <CABkLOboQZyoFGbjjXBwGPi4iQ7XBGW4L9dqiXRwztJEeODpm=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1326133550-6706-1-git-send-email-urwithsughosh@gmail.com>
	<201201111950.50699.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<CABkLOboQZyoFGbjjXBwGPi4iQ7XBGW4L9dqiXRwztJEeODpm=w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201201112313.41176.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed Jan 11, 2012 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> > >   More so, given the fact that we don't have any control over
> >> > >   rbl -- so if rbl changes it's layout for any subsequent board,
> >> > >   we'd have to add that as well to the nand driver, and both in
> >> > >   u-boot as well as the kernel.
> >> > >   
> >> > >   I guess the cleanest solution would have been for the rbl to have
> >> > >   used the same layout as the one used by u-boot and linux.
> >> > 
> >> > Yep, why not do that then?
> >> > 
> >>   Because rbl is a proprietary bootloader from TI.
> > 
> > Don't we actually have replacement bootloader in uboot already ? You
> 
> don't need
> 
> > xloader with uboot anymore I think.
> 
> RBL ist the ROM bootloader in the SoC, it's not only proprietary but also
> in ROM and hence cannot be changed.
> 
> RBL executes an AIS script. Sughosh, could you please explain what your AIS
> does or how you create it?

So basically, this SPL business can be avoided and this all can be done in a 
standard way?

M
> 
> Regards, Christian