From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:25:19 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] mx28: Fix reboot from the kernel
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5AVy1DJ+MkdRjeTZphUz5vPRK4U_5jEFfzBt5zqc0gkvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1327422192-24762-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
	<201201250049.00152.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<CAOMZO5AVy1DJ+MkdRjeTZphUz5vPRK4U_5jEFfzBt5zqc0gkvg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201201250225.19345.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you explain why this patch fixes anything ? It's hard to understand
> > why doing this would fix it.
> 
> Yes, I agree and that's why I marked it as RFC and please also see my
> comments below the --- line.
> 
> I don't understand the reason for the fix as well. Matthias' patch for
> adding the boot mode information in mx28 magically fixed the reboot
> issue and playing with his patch I realized that any instruction prior
> to mxs_iomux_setup_multiple_pads "fixes" the reboot problem.

Now that IS CREEPY. You mean like ... just anything ? Or does the code executed 
before need to be exactly long or longer than something ?

M
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Fabio Estevam