From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Lapin Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:59:41 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/14] Nokia RX-51 support In-Reply-To: <18968071.Leu8NhnCD2@pali> References: <1327415291-13260-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201201252300.34334.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20120126162558.GB2056@build.ihdev.net> <18968071.Leu8NhnCD2@pali> Message-ID: <20120127085940.GC2056@build.ihdev.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote: > On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it. > > > > Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign > > SPL binary for OMAP's secure boot ROM. IIRC N950/N9 is even more strict > > regarding that, am I right? > > You are right, we cannot sign SPL binary for N900 because we do not have key. > Signing key has only somebody in Nokia (or in TI). I do not have N950/N9 so I > do not know anything about new devices. Probably autobuilder does have a key, but the question is if key is different for each device or not. > > > > > > > I know. So ... ? Basically you can use the TI flashes too since it all > > > goes > > > through the bootrom, right? > > > > Butrom requires signed binary. > > > > Yes and format of signed binary is not published by TI (there are only some RE > info about Motorola Omap devices). Well, format is somewhat documented in public TI specifications, but that won't help anyway becase of OMAP's little OTP memory... > > I can try to play with SPL U-Boot binary and X-Loader in qemu. But this and > next month I do not have time for it... Me neither. All the best, S.