public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Do we really need CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT ?
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:48:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203011448.13128.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BgtV61eA3p0hih363QmR4rXbjH09ht=O7727wWb1ok-Q@mail.gmail.com>

> Hi,
> 
> Currently CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT is used to select arch_cpu_init() function.
> 
> arch_cpu_init() does CPU level initialization, so why do we need to
> include CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT in the include/configs/boardXYZ files,
> which are board related files ?
> 
> For example:
> 
> Let's say boards X, Y and Z are based on SoC S:
> 
> 1. If processor S has a arch_cpu_init() defined, then it means that
> X,Y,Z need the code from arch_cpu_init() and then we need to define
> CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT for each of these boards (actually all the boards
> based on this processor would need CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT)
> 
> 2. If not all boards need the code inside arch_cpu_init() for
> processor S, then it means that this code is not really CPU specific
> and then it should be moved to board code.
> 
> I was thinking in doing the following:
> 
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> @@ -224,10 +224,15 @@ void __dram_init_banksize(void)
>  void dram_init_banksize(void)
>         __attribute__((weak, alias("__dram_init_banksize")));
> 
> +int __arch_cpu_init(void)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +int arch_cpu_init(void)
> +       __attribute__((weak, alias("__arch_cpu_init")));
> +
>  init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT)
>         arch_cpu_init,          /* basic arch cpu dependent setup */
> -#endif
>  #if defined(CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F)
>         board_early_init_f,
>  #endif
> 
> ,so that CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT is not needed anymore.
> 
> Before I go further in this route to remove CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT from
> other places, I would like to know if this makes sense.

I'm all for this.

M

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-01 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-01 13:23 [U-Boot] Do we really need CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT ? Fabio Estevam
2012-03-01 13:48 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-03-02  7:19   ` Stefan Roese
2012-03-01 20:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-03-02  8:46   ` Christian Riesch
2012-03-02  9:41     ` Christian Riesch
2012-03-01 21:28 ` Simon Glass
2012-03-01 22:19   ` Graeme Russ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201203011448.13128.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox