From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:59:21 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] net: fec_mxc: allow use with cache enabled
In-Reply-To: <4F54E1FB.4090000@boundarydevices.com>
References: <1330729572-12642-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
	<201203051639.57986.marex@denx.de>
	<4F54E1FB.4090000@boundarydevices.com>
Message-ID: <201203051859.21952.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Eric Nelson,

> On 03/05/2012 08:39 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Eric Nelson,
> > 
> >> On 03/04/2012 06:49 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 03/02/2012 04:39 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> +			 * Invalidate data cache over the buffer
> >>>>>> +			 */
> >>>>>> +			addr = (uint32_t)frame;
> >>>>>> +			size = roundup(frame_length,
> > 
> > CONFIG_FEC_DATA_ALIGNMENT);
> > 
> >>>>>> +			invalidate_dcache_range(addr, addr + size);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> DTTO here, frame length might not be aligned properly, or will it be?
> >>>>> Network stack must be properly analyzed here.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The hardware won't return an unaligned value here, so this should be
> >>>> good.
> >>> 
> >>> Are you sure? You can't receive frame aligned to 8 bytes boundary?
> >> 
> >> Unless I'm missing something, received packet start addresses are
> >> defined by the driver in fec_rbd_init(), the code just modified to use
> >> memalign, so we're good here.
> > 
> > Ok, that's good then. I'll skim through this driver one more time tonight
> > and see what comes out from it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I just sent V2.

I can't seem to find it, did you really send it?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut