From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:51:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203061351.40228.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F55FDBE.2000904@st.com>
Dear Amit Virdi,
> Hello Mike and Marek,
>
> On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>>>>>> Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a ?crit :
> >>>>>>>> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
> >>>>>>>> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
> >>>>>>>> Reverting the structures to non-packed
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If (just asking, not asserting) the issue is caused by fields being
> >>>>>>> u8 where u8 access is not possible, then should you not make the
> >>>>>>> fields u16 / u32 according to access requirements?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem is not with the fields being of a different width.
> >>>>>> AFAIK, the packed attribute changes the generated code to access
> >>>>>> even the word field elements in a byte by byte manner
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Infact, there is a discussion on lkml that I can point
> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/27/278
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It seems that the discussion did not lead to a conclusion but it was
> >>>>>> sensible (at least for ARM) to remove the packed attribute from this
> >>>>>> structure
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What does the USB spec say ? It might be a HW bug?
> >>>>
> >>>> it isn't covered by the USB spec. these are structs for hardware
> >>>> registers in the EHCI usb host controller.
> >>>
> >>> I see ... so replacing them with unions of accessors where it colides
> >>> might
> >>> work ?
> >>
> >> i'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but i think you're pointing
> >> to the
> >> right answer: drivers/usb/host/ehci.h:ehci_{read,write}l() should
> >> *not* be
> >> casting/derferencing the pointers directly. they should instead be using
> >> standard {read,write}l() funcs from asm/io.h.
> >>
> >> Amit: can you post a new patch that does that instead ? don't touch the
> >> packed attribute, but change ehci_readl() to use readl() and
> >> ehci_writel() to
> >> use writel() ?
> >
> > I'll make the changes and post the patch after testing successfully.
>
> I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
> didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
> retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
> come here too.
>
> Today, I used armv7-linux-gcc (GCC) v4.6.2
> So I suspect there has been some fix done in the GCC.
>
> Now, even with the packed attributes, the word fields are accessed
> word-by-word in contrast to the earlier observed behavior
> (byte-by-byte). I could see ldr and str in the disassembly.
>
> May be, we can discard this patch and keep drivers/usb/host/ehci.h intact.
Can you check with different toolchain please?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 11:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures Amit Virdi
2012-02-24 19:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 10:02 ` Amit Virdi
2012-02-27 18:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-25 10:12 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-27 7:16 ` Vipin Kumar
2012-02-27 13:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-27 18:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 20:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-28 0:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-29 10:25 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 12:06 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 12:51 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-03-07 8:30 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 11:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-07 12:12 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 16:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 8:23 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 13:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 13:49 ` Amit Virdi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203061351.40228.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox