From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:02:35 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] OneNAND custodian (was: Re: [RESEND 0/4] onenand: OneNAND board dependent probe and fixes for Samsung targets) In-Reply-To: <4F565D21.8070402@freescale.com> References: <1320914477-27885-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1331016880-28873-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <4F565D21.8070402@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20120307100235.773faf38@lmajewski.digital.local> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:53:21 +0100 Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/06/2012 12:54 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > This patch sets add board dependent onenand probes. > > > > Several fixes for GONI and Exynos4210 (C210_universal) targets have > > been added. > > > > Tested at: > > Samsung S5PC110 GONI > > Samsung Exynos4210 (S5PC210 Universal) > > > > Lukasz Majewski (4): > > onenand:samsung Target dependent OneNAND chip probe function > > onenand:samsung OneNAND chip probe functions added for GONI and > > Exynos4210 > > onenand: Replace ONENAND_IS_MLC() test with ONENAND_HAS_4KB() > > onenand: samsung: Enable support OneNAND support at Samsung's > > Exynos4210 > > Is anyone interested in being a OneNAND custodian? > > I've taken some OneNAND patches in the past, but it's a completely > separate subsystem from NAND, and nobody seems interested in changing > that. I not only have no hardware, but also no documentation other > than marketing materials. I lack the context to properly review > OneNAND patches. > > -Scott Hi Scott, Some of our targets still use that kind of memory (Goni and Universal C210). I can volunteer as a OneNAND custodian. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung Poland R&D Center Platform Group