From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:21:18 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/6] Enable Thumb build for ARM platforms In-Reply-To: <20120315211251.GB6855@bill-the-cat> References: <1331227222-12419-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com> <20120315202316.GA6855@bill-the-cat> <20120315204615.094132033C9@gemini.denx.de> <20120315210150.DC5122033C9@gemini.denx.de> <20120315211251.GB6855@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20120315222118.GC6855@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:12:51PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:01:50PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > In message you wrote: > > > > > > > I don't consider it a big problem (just a bit sad) if ELDK 4.2 cannot > > > > be used for building these. However, I think it is not acceptable > > > > tobuild known-to-be-broken images. If the tool chain is too old, this > > > > shall result in a clear error message and abort of the build. > > > > > > Is an #error in a common omap4/5 file sufficient or does it need to be > > > sooner than that? > > > > If it can be tested there, it can probably also tested before we start > > building at all? > > I suspect no just because the kernel does this in > I take it back, we can do that if we bring in the archprepare rule logic that the kernel has. I'll go down this path now... -- Tom