[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> > Sent: 21 March 2012 12:52
> > To: Luka Perkov
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; dreagle at doukki.net; Wolfgang Denk; Prafulla
> > Wadaskar
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0
> > 
> > Dear Luka Perkov,
> > 
> > > Hi Marek,
> 
> ...snip...
> 
> > > > > This is my proposal - I'll resend v4 and it should be ok to
> > 
> > commit
> > 
> > > > > without fixes for:
> > > > >  1) IB62x0_OE_LOW and IB62x0_OE_HIGH
> > > > >  2) CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> > > > >  3) ifdef indentation
> > > > > 
> > > > > Because fixing the 1) and 2) is more than adding support for
> > 
> > this new
> > 
> > > > > board, and if it was in the same patch I would need to separate
> > 
> > it.
> > 
> > > > > That is a different issue.
> > > > 
> > > > You can wait for Prafulla with #1 and #2, also for #2 check my
> > 
> > comment.
> > 
> > > > But we have two bugs going on for granted here at least and
> > 
> > they're not
> > 
> > > > your boards fault. On the other hand, it'd be cool if you could
> > 
> > fix them
> > 
> > > > prior to adding your board ;-)
> 
> Hi Luka
> 
> #1: Defining these values as 0xffffffff, indicates that all GPIOs are
> configured high by default. so this configuration solely depends upon your
> board requirement.
> 
> #2: on kirkwood, you should define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT since
> lowlevel_init is not needed on Kirkwood platforms. (ref:
> doc/README.kwbimage)

Prafulla, you're then missing the fiddling with CPSR bits, which might be quite 
necessary.

> 
> Regards..
> Prafulla . . .

Best regards,
Marek Vasut