From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot build report @ Sat Mar 31 05:30:15 CEST 2012
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:30:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204021830.29738.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120402162140.GB4829@bill-the-cat>
Dear Tom Rini,
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Tom Rini,
> >
> > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > Hello guys,
> > > >
> > > > we now have exactly these boards not building for -RC1, can you
> > > > please look into
> > >
> > > > it?:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > arm/hawkboard FAILED FOR: eldk4.2
> > > > arm/hawkboard_uart FAILED FOR: eldk4.2
> > >
> > > SPL link failure. Newer toolchains give us a built-in udelay, and we
> > > provide __udelay but not udelay on these boards since we don't use
> > > CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT and adding that in might be a fatal size
> > > bloat. Not sure what we want to do about this, and the last thread or
> > > two about this was unresolved.
> >
> > But we have --gc-sections and stuff like that so unneeded bloat should be
> > removed.
>
> OK, in this case --gc-sections and how our code is structured work
> together and a quick for each symbol in spl/libgeneric.o check of
> spl/u-boot-spl shows nothing unneeded added with ELDK4.2 and with newer
> toolchains nothing at all added.
>
> > And it's not only this, I see also problem with lldiv.
>
> Same thing, built-in vs not.
So I can expect a patch?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 12:59 [U-Boot] U-Boot build report @ Sat Mar 31 05:30:15 CEST 2012 Marek Vasut
2012-03-31 13:43 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2012-03-31 14:04 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2012-03-31 14:12 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-31 15:51 ` Simon Glass
2012-03-31 15:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-31 16:22 ` Simon Glass
2012-03-31 17:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 15:54 ` Tom Rini
2012-04-02 16:10 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 16:21 ` Tom Rini
2012-04-02 16:30 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204021830.29738.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox