From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:30:29 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot build report @ Sat Mar 31 05:30:15 CEST 2012
In-Reply-To: <20120402162140.GB4829@bill-the-cat>
References: <201203311459.06597.marex@denx.de>
	<201204021810.19005.marex@denx.de>
	<20120402162140.GB4829@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <201204021830.29738.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Tom Rini,

> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Tom Rini,
> > 
> > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > Hello guys,
> > > > 
> > > > we now have exactly these boards not building for -RC1, can you
> > > > please look into
> > > 
> > > > it?:
> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > > arm/hawkboard                           FAILED FOR: eldk4.2
> > > > arm/hawkboard_uart                      FAILED FOR: eldk4.2
> > > 
> > > SPL link failure.  Newer toolchains give us a built-in udelay, and we
> > > provide __udelay but not udelay on these boards since we don't use
> > > CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT and adding that in might be a fatal size
> > > bloat.  Not sure what we want to do about this, and the last thread or
> > > two about this was unresolved.
> > 
> > But we have --gc-sections and stuff like that so unneeded bloat should be
> > removed.
> 
> OK, in this case --gc-sections and how our code is structured work
> together and a quick for each symbol in spl/libgeneric.o check of
> spl/u-boot-spl shows nothing unneeded added with ELDK4.2 and with newer
> toolchains nothing at all added.
> 
> > And it's not only this, I see also problem with lldiv.
> 
> Same thing, built-in vs not.

So I can expect a patch?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut