* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
@ 2012-04-02 18:24 Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 18:39 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Initialize the DMA controller so that the following errors are fixed:
U-Boot 2012.04-rc1-00001-g037cbfd (Apr 02 2012 - 10:57:48)
Freescale i.MX28 family at 454 MHz
DRAM: 128 MiB
MMC: MXS MMC: 0
MMC0: DMA transfer failed
MMC0: DMA transfer failed
MMC0: DMA transfer failed
MMC0: DMA transfer failed
MMC init failed
In order to not break the DMA NAND support, remove mxs_dma_init from the
NAND driver now that it is called from the core dma file.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
--
Changes since v1:
- Call mxs_dma_init() from a common location and remove it
from the mxs_nand driver
drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c | 2 ++
drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c | 3 ---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
index c086629..68c4be2 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
@@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
uint32_t size;
+ /* Initialize the DMA controller. */
+ mxs_dma_init();
size = roundup(sizeof(struct mxs_dma_desc), MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
pdesc = memalign(MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT, size);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
index 4b1297a..95eac35 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
@@ -1072,9 +1072,6 @@ int mxs_nand_init(struct mxs_nand_info *info)
goto err2;
}
- /* Init the DMA controller. */
- mxs_dma_init();
-
/* Reset the GPMI block. */
mx28_reset_block(&gpmi_regs->hw_gpmi_ctrl0_reg);
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 18:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 18:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 18:54 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> Initialize the DMA controller so that the following errors are fixed:
>
> U-Boot 2012.04-rc1-00001-g037cbfd (Apr 02 2012 - 10:57:48)
>
> Freescale i.MX28 family at 454 MHz
> DRAM: 128 MiB
> MMC: MXS MMC: 0
> MMC0: DMA transfer failed
> MMC0: DMA transfer failed
> MMC0: DMA transfer failed
> MMC0: DMA transfer failed
> MMC init failed
>
> In order to not break the DMA NAND support, remove mxs_dma_init from the
> NAND driver now that it is called from the core dma file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> --
> Changes since v1:
> - Call mxs_dma_init() from a common location and remove it
> from the mxs_nand driver
>
> drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c | 2 ++
> drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> index c086629..68c4be2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,8 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
> struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
> uint32_t size;
>
> + /* Initialize the DMA controller. */
> + mxs_dma_init();
This mxs_dma_desc_alloc() is called in a loop in the MXS NAND driver, this is
even worse ;-)
Possibly some common mx28 init code would be better?
NAK (sorry, I know it hurts)
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 18:39 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 18:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:03 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> This mxs_dma_desc_alloc() is called in a loop in the MXS NAND driver, this is
> even worse ;-)
>
> Possibly some common mx28 init code would be better?
If I put it in mx28.c like that:
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
@@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ int arch_cpu_init(void)
*/
mxs_gpio_init();
+ mxs_dma_init();
+
return 0;
}
#endif
,MMC still fails.
Still looking for a good place for calling mxs_dma_init();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 18:54 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 19:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > This mxs_dma_desc_alloc() is called in a loop in the MXS NAND driver,
> > this is even worse ;-)
> >
> > Possibly some common mx28 init code would be better?
>
> If I put it in mx28.c like that:
>
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ int arch_cpu_init(void)
> */
> mxs_gpio_init();
>
> + mxs_dma_init();
> +
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> ,MMC still fails.
Because that's called before relocation ;-)
>
> Still looking for a good place for calling mxs_dma_init();
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:03 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:30 ` Anatolij Gustschin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> Because that's called before relocation ;-)
What about this?
--- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
static struct mxs_dma_chan mxs_dma_channels[MXS_MAX_DMA_CHANNELS];
+static int first;
/*
* Test is the DMA channel is valid channel
*/
@@ -346,6 +347,10 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
uint32_t size;
+ if (!first)
+ mxs_dma_init();
+ first++;
+
size = roundup(sizeof(struct mxs_dma_desc), MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
pdesc = memalign(MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT, size);
Too ugly? Or any better place for calling mxs_dma_init()?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 19:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:30 ` Anatolij Gustschin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > Because that's called before relocation ;-)
>
> What about this?
>
> --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>
> static struct mxs_dma_chan mxs_dma_channels[MXS_MAX_DMA_CHANNELS];
>
> +static int first;
> /*
> * Test is the DMA channel is valid channel
> */
> @@ -346,6 +347,10 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
> struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
> uint32_t size;
>
> + if (!first)
> + mxs_dma_init();
> + first++;
> +
> size = roundup(sizeof(struct mxs_dma_desc), MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
> pdesc = memalign(MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT, size);
>
> Too ugly? Or any better place for calling mxs_dma_init()?
I'd say arch_misc_init(), if it was before nand_init() though. Maybe we need
arch_early_init_r() ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:26 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 19:30 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2012-04-02 19:38 ` Marek Vasut
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Anatolij Gustschin @ 2012-04-02 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Fabio,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:18:18 -0300
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
> > Because that's called before relocation ;-)
>
> What about this?
>
> --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>
> static struct mxs_dma_chan mxs_dma_channels[MXS_MAX_DMA_CHANNELS];
>
> +static int first;
> /*
> * Test is the DMA channel is valid channel
> */
> @@ -346,6 +347,10 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
> struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
> uint32_t size;
>
> + if (!first)
> + mxs_dma_init();
> + first++;
> +
> size = roundup(sizeof(struct mxs_dma_desc), MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
> pdesc = memalign(MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT, size);
>
> Too ugly? Or any better place for calling mxs_dma_init()?
Won't calling mxs_dma_init() from arch_misc_init() work?
Thanks,
Anatolij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:30 ` Anatolij Gustschin
@ 2012-04-02 19:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Anatolij Gustschin,
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:18:18 -0300
>
> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > > Because that's called before relocation ;-)
> >
> > What about this?
> >
> > --- a/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/apbh_dma.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> >
> > static struct mxs_dma_chan mxs_dma_channels[MXS_MAX_DMA_CHANNELS];
> >
> > +static int first;
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * Test is the DMA channel is valid channel
> > */
> >
> > @@ -346,6 +347,10 @@ struct mxs_dma_desc *mxs_dma_desc_alloc(void)
> >
> > struct mxs_dma_desc *pdesc;
> > uint32_t size;
> >
> > + if (!first)
> > + mxs_dma_init();
> > + first++;
> > +
> >
> > size = roundup(sizeof(struct mxs_dma_desc), MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
> > pdesc = memalign(MXS_DMA_ALIGNMENT, size);
> >
> > Too ugly? Or any better place for calling mxs_dma_init()?
>
> Won't calling mxs_dma_init() from arch_misc_init() work?
No, because that's called after NAND is inited. And NAND needs DMA for it's init
:(
>
> Thanks,
> Anatolij
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:38 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:54 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>> Won't calling mxs_dma_init() from arch_misc_init() work?
>
> No, because that's called after NAND is inited. And NAND needs DMA for it's init
> :(
Correct.
Should we go with my ugly hack then?
Or what do you mean when you proposed arch_early_init_r ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 19:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 20:44 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> Won't calling mxs_dma_init() from arch_misc_init() work?
> >
> > No, because that's called after NAND is inited. And NAND needs DMA for
> > it's init
> >
> > :(
>
> Correct.
>
> Should we go with my ugly hack then?
>
> Or what do you mean when you proposed arch_early_init_r ?
Yes another hook function that'd be called early in board_init_r()
btw. Fabio, I really appreciate your work on this, sorry to keep tormenting you
so much.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 19:54 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 20:44 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 20:52 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> Yes another hook function that'd be called early in board_init_r()
Ok, please see the patch below and let me know if you like it.
If you do, then I can probably split it in 2 parts:
one that introduces arch_early_init_r() and another one that fixes the
mmc problem on mx28.
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
index cf6d4e9..6c148a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <asm/arch/iomux.h>
#include <asm/arch/imx-regs.h>
#include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
+#include <asm/arch/dma.h>
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
@@ -297,3 +298,14 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
"display clocks",
""
);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
+int arch_early_init_r(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_APBH_DMA
+ /* Initialize the DMA controller. */
+ mxs_dma_init();
+#endif
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
index 4ca75f9..9f3cae5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void cpu_init_cp15(void);
/* cpu/.../arch/cpu.c */
int arch_cpu_init(void);
int arch_misc_init(void);
+int arch_early_init_r(void);
/* board/.../... */
int board_init(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
index 5270c11..025d6ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
@@ -500,6 +500,10 @@ void board_init_r(gd_t *id, ulong dest_addr)
malloc_start = dest_addr - TOTAL_MALLOC_LEN;
mem_malloc_init (malloc_start, TOTAL_MALLOC_LEN);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
+ arch_early_init_r();
+#endif
+
#if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH)
puts("Flash: ");
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
index 4b1297a..95eac35 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
@@ -1072,9 +1072,6 @@ int mxs_nand_init(struct mxs_nand_info *info)
goto err2;
}
- /* Init the DMA controller. */
- mxs_dma_init();
-
/* Reset the GPMI block. */
mx28_reset_block(&gpmi_regs->hw_gpmi_ctrl0_reg);
diff --git a/include/configs/m28evk.h b/include/configs/m28evk.h
index 8b83180..b0e6d3b 100644
--- a/include/configs/m28evk.h
+++ b/include/configs/m28evk.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
#define CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT
#define CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT
+#define CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
/*
* SPL
diff --git a/include/configs/mx28evk.h b/include/configs/mx28evk.h
index 705fdab..350e833 100644
--- a/include/configs/mx28evk.h
+++ b/include/configs/mx28evk.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
#define CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT
#define CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT
+#define CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
/*
* SPL
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 20:44 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 20:52 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 20:54 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > Yes another hook function that'd be called early in board_init_r()
>
> Ok, please see the patch below and let me know if you like it.
>
> If you do, then I can probably split it in 2 parts:
> one that introduces arch_early_init_r() and another one that fixes the
> mmc problem on mx28.
Well ... CCing Albert to express his concerns about this.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
> index cf6d4e9..6c148a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/mx28.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <asm/arch/iomux.h>
> #include <asm/arch/imx-regs.h>
> #include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/dma.h>
>
> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>
> @@ -297,3 +298,14 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
> "display clocks",
> ""
> );
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
> +int arch_early_init_r(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_APBH_DMA
> + /* Initialize the DMA controller. */
> + mxs_dma_init();
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
> index 4ca75f9..9f3cae5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/u-boot-arm.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void cpu_init_cp15(void);
> /* cpu/.../arch/cpu.c */
> int arch_cpu_init(void);
> int arch_misc_init(void);
> +int arch_early_init_r(void);
>
> /* board/.../... */
> int board_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> index 5270c11..025d6ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,10 @@ void board_init_r(gd_t *id, ulong dest_addr)
> malloc_start = dest_addr - TOTAL_MALLOC_LEN;
> mem_malloc_init (malloc_start, TOTAL_MALLOC_LEN);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
> + arch_early_init_r();
> +#endif
> +
> #if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH)
> puts("Flash: ");
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
> index 4b1297a..95eac35 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
> @@ -1072,9 +1072,6 @@ int mxs_nand_init(struct mxs_nand_info *info)
> goto err2;
> }
>
> - /* Init the DMA controller. */
> - mxs_dma_init();
> -
> /* Reset the GPMI block. */
> mx28_reset_block(&gpmi_regs->hw_gpmi_ctrl0_reg);
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/m28evk.h b/include/configs/m28evk.h
> index 8b83180..b0e6d3b 100644
> --- a/include/configs/m28evk.h
> +++ b/include/configs/m28evk.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
> #define CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT
> #define CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT
> +#define CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
>
> /*
> * SPL
> diff --git a/include/configs/mx28evk.h b/include/configs/mx28evk.h
> index 705fdab..350e833 100644
> --- a/include/configs/mx28evk.h
> +++ b/include/configs/mx28evk.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #define CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
> #define CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT
> #define CONFIG_ARCH_MISC_INIT
> +#define CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_INIT_R
>
> /*
> * SPL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 20:52 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2012-04-02 20:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 21:00 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2012-04-02 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> Well ... CCing Albert to express his concerns about this.
Ok, great.
Just to let you know that I also tested NAND on my board (will add
mx28evk support for NAND later).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA
2012-04-02 20:54 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2012-04-02 21:00 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2012-04-02 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > Well ... CCing Albert to express his concerns about this.
>
> Ok, great.
>
> Just to let you know that I also tested NAND on my board (will add
> mx28evk support for NAND later).
Good job, Fabio! :)
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-02 21:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-02 18:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: mxsmmc: Fix operation with DMA Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 18:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 18:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:03 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:30 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2012-04-02 19:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 19:50 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 19:54 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 20:44 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 20:52 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 20:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-02 21:00 ` Marek Vasut
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox