[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v4] ARM : Add GPIO Driver and IOMUX definition for S3C2440

[Gabriel Huau <contact@huau-gabriel.fr>]

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:40:35PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 01:16 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> > Dear Marek,
> > 
> > On 2 May 2012 11:44, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >>>> +int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +       unsigned l = readl(GPIO_FULLPORT(gpio));
> >>>> +       unsigned port = GPIO_FULLPORT(gpio);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       /*
> >>>> +        * All GPIO Port have a configuration on
> >>>> +        * 2 bits excepted the first GPIO (A) which
> >>>> +        * have only 1 bit of configuration.
> >>>> +        */
> >>>> +       if (value)
> >>>> +               if (!GPIO_PORT(gpio))
> >>>> +                       l |= (0x1 << GPIO_BIT(gpio));
> >>>> +               else
> >>>> +                       l |= (0x3 << GPIO_BIT(gpio));
> >>>> +       else
> >>>> +               if (!GPIO_PORT(gpio))
> >>>> +                       l &= ~(0x1 << GPIO_BIT(gpio));
> >>>> +               else
> >>>> +                       l &= ~(0x3 << GPIO_BIT(gpio));
> >>>
> >>> Need brace at this if..else statement.
> >>
> >> I wanted to ask why, but ... C isn't python, good point ;-)
> > 
> > As I know, it's a rule of u-boot.. maybe. :)
> 
> It is a U-Boot rule (multi-line if/loop body), and also it's good to
> avoid the ambiguous "if/if/else" construct, but wouldn't this be better as:
> 
> if (GPIO_PORT(gpio))
> 	bit = 1 << GPIO_BIT(gpio);
> else
> 	bit = 3 << GPIO_BIT(gpio);
> 
> if (value)
> 	l |= bit;
> else
> 	l &= ~bit;
> 
> ?
> 

For multi-line, we should maybe patch the checkpatch.pl to check this
statement. But, indeed, I will do the modification of Scott.

> -Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot