From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs-i2c: Fix internal address byte order
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:13:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205071813.38742.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4003996.WymTGke6fF@linux-1fbo.site>
Dear Torsten Fleischer,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> > > Large EEPROMs, e.g. 24lc32, need 2 byte to address the internal memory.
> > > These devices require that the high byte of the internal address has to
> > > be written first.
> > > The mxs_i2c driver currently writes the address' low byte first.
> >
> > Are you sure about it? Are you sure what you're seeing isn't FIFO
> > overrun?
>
> Yes, because I used 'i2c md' and 'i2c mw' for the test and these commands
> do only a small write transfer. They write 3 and 4 bytes respectively.
> This is in both cases only one FIFO word.
>
> > Basically, how does your problem manifest? How did you test this?
>
> First I wrote different bytes into the addresses 0x00 and 0x01 of the
> EEPROM using 'i2c mw', for example:
>
> => i2c mw 54 0.2 12
> => i2c mw 54 1.2 34
>
> Then I read the address range 0x00 - 0x01 and got:
>
> => i2c md 54 0.2 2
> 0000: 12 ff ..
>
> That's not what I had expected. On address 0x01 there should be '34'
> instead of 'ff'.
> But when I read directly from the address 0x01 the command returned the
> correct value:
>
> => i2c md 54 1.2 1
> 0001: 34 4
>
> Thereupon I checked the I2C frame of the read and write commands to the
> address 0x01 with an oscilloscope. The scope showed that after the device's
> address the bytes 0x01 followed by 0x00 were sent to the EEPROM. But the
> two bytes must be in reverse order.
>
> After inspecting the source code I swapped the address bytes, i.e. I used
> '100.2' instead of '1.2'. With it the read/write command accessed the
> address 0x01 of the EEPROM. I verified this with the scope.
>
> Reading the range 0x00 - 0x01 returned then the expected content:
>
> => i2c md 54 0.2 2
> 0000: 12 34 .4
>
> I also tested the address byte swapping - before and after modifying the
> driver - with other addresses (e.g. 0x0180 and 0x0fff) by checking the I2C
> frames with the scope.
> After fixing the driver, I additionally read the whole EEPROM using 'i2c
> md' and verified the written addresses.
Oh this is very nice! Thanks a lot!
Obviously:
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Best Regards
> Torsten Fleischer
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 15:37 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs-i2c: Fix internal address byte order Torsten Fleischer
2012-04-17 20:30 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-01 2:45 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-07 14:59 ` Torsten Fleischer
2012-05-07 16:13 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-05-09 9:41 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205071813.38742.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox