From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Jander Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:36:26 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [resent] New chapter in i.MX51 datasheet an issue? In-Reply-To: <4FA91C47.4040201@denx.de> References: <20120504120845.4f0e59ea@archvile> <4FA6A396.6010201@denx.de> <20120507091128.32f60571@archvile> <4FA8DD52.6090001@denx.de> <20120508140622.737b0fb1@archvile> <4FA91C47.4040201@denx.de> Message-ID: <20120509113626.2d4a86c5@archvile> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:14:47 +0200 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 08/05/2012 14:06, David Jander wrote: > > >> Go ahead in this direction. Then we can test on these boards (mx51evk / > >> vision2 / efikamx), the only ones having these issue). > > > > I agree we should only change the headers, but... if there are more i.MX51 > > boards, they may all potentially need to fix their board code.... and that is > > up to them. Unfortunately this warning/wake-up call should come from Freescale > > themselves, but I have not heared anything from them. > > What we can do is to change all MX51 boards in mainline (the three > boards we have already mentioned), explaining in the commit-id of the > patch why we change. We do not care about boards that were not pushed to > mainline. Seems reasonable. Are you also implying that you are willing to propose a patch? (Swapping the two values seems fairly trivial....) Best regards, -- David Jander Protonic Holland.