From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:12:45 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] net: add eth_setenv_enetaddr_by_index()
In-Reply-To: <20120511211602.BED12206496@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1336671134-16342-1-git-send-email-michael@walle.cc>
	<201205112301.50311.michael@walle.cc>
	<20120511211602.BED12206496@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201205120012.45444.michael@walle.cc>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:16:02 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Michael Walle,
> 
> In message <201205112301.50311.michael@walle.cc> you wrote:
> > > Eventually this should be made configurable?
> > 
> > Given the above, i would keep it non-configurable if youre fine with
> > that.
> 
> Only if the code size for the existing boards that don't need this
> does not grow.
Well i can't add a new function without increasing the filesize, can i? 

Using inline functions would be one option, but that would be inconsistend 
with the eth_getenv_enetaddr_by_index().

phew, i wonder how the eth_getenv_enetaddr_by_index() made it into uboot ;)

-- 
michael