From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 01:35:53 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX: fsl_esdhc: allow use with cache
	enabled.
In-Reply-To: <4FB2E05C.6070304@boundarydevices.com>
References: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/#119312>
	<20120515150933.7f642e77@wker>
	<4FB2E05C.6070304@boundarydevices.com>
Message-ID: <201205160135.53913.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Eric Nelson,

> On 05/15/2012 06:09 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Hi Dirk,
> > 
> > On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:58:54 +0200
> > 
> > Dirk Behme<dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>  wrote:
> >> On 09.05.2012 07:45, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> >>> The problem with an #ifdef is that it is not very generic - we should
> >>> add some #if (defined(CONFIG_MX51) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || ...
> >>> and update the driver for each new SOCs. I think also that maybe the
> >>> best way is to add an empty flush_dcache_range() to the MPC85xx, maybe
> >>> as weak function.
> >> 
> >> You might have noticed that I'm looking through my list of open patches.
> >> So: Any news regarding V3 of this patch? ;)
> > 
> > Stefano is on vacation; please don't expect any quick reply from him.
> 
> Vacation? Is that one of those European words I should really know? ;)
> 
> I don't have the same excuse. I'm just struggling to find a few hours
> to take a stab at this.
> 
> I'm without a PPC device and compiler, so I'll need some assistance in
> validating things.

Well if you put up the tree somewhere, I can run it for you ;-)

> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Eric

Best regards,
Marek Vasut