From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:22:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] MX28: Add u-boot.mx28.sd and
	u-boot.mx28.nand make targets
In-Reply-To: <20120523114724.7F60C20025A@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1337729574-30475-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
	<201205231334.53948.marex@denx.de>
	<20120523114724.7F60C20025A@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201205231422.17293.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

> Dear Marek Vasut,
> 
> In message <201205231334.53948.marex@denx.de> you wrote:
> > > > Maybe add some switch statement based on CONFIG_MX28 or another
> > > > within the target?
> > > 
> > > I can't parse this sentence - and I don't understand why you think
> > > any specific name would be needed or useful.
> > 
> > Well consider some completely different board would want to use the same
> > target name -- u-boot.sd -- for the resulting image. How would that be
> > handled?
> 
> I fail to understand which problem you see.
> 
> All board use the same target name "u-boot.bin" - and everything is
> fine.
> 
> What would be wrong if all boards would use the same "u-boot.bin.sdcard"
> target name?

That such file (u-boot.bin.sdcard) would be generated by a different tool for 
each different board, unlike u-boot.bin . Maybe I'm just flat missing something 
here.

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

Best regards,
Marek Vasut