From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:35:49 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mxsboot: stop referring to i.MX28 as this
	ought to work for all i.MXS SoCs
Message-ID: <20120529213549.74CD82073AD@gemini.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Otavio,

I wrote:

> In message <CAP9ODKoA--EB3EsRP-OrFJ191fTOZvE-gFYCZrULkEtdC=3yYg@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > > But I haven't seen "i.MXS" used before, and to me it makes no sense as
> > > it mixes unrelated name spaces.
> > >
> > > Please either use the Freescale name(s), or use "mxs".
> > 
> > http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=i.MXS
> 
> It seems you are supporting my argument?  Because the "i.MXS" I see
> documented there appears to have very little in common with, for
> example, i.MX28: "The processor features an ARM920T? core operating at
> 100 MHz"... ?

Or look at the "Parametrics" section: 

- Not Recommended for New Design
- No Longer Manufactured

"i.MXS" is definitely a bad choice of name for what you have in mind.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Honest error is to be pitied, not ridiculed.
                                       -- Philip Earl of Chesterfield