From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Allen Martin Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:18:02 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/10] ARM: add tegra20 support to arm720t In-Reply-To: <4FCFACE1.8030800@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1338931225-12246-1-git-send-email-amartin@nvidia.com> <1338931225-12246-7-git-send-email-amartin@nvidia.com> <4FCF87DD.7080203@wwwdotorg.org> <20120606182545.GE13311@nvidia.com> <4FCFACE1.8030800@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120606221802.GK13311@nvidia.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:17:53PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > Oh, I see. MACH_TEGRA_GENERIC means "some Tegra SoC", and CONFIG_TEGRA* > indicate which one. Coming from my kernel background, MACH_* is a define > for a particular board, and we do have a GENERIC Tegra board, so I got > the wrong end of the stick. > > I wonder if it's worth renaming CONFIG_MACH_TEGRA_GENERIC to > CONFIG_TEGRA. There don't appear to be any users of it currently. Fine by me, maybe CONFIG_TEGRA2 should go to CONFIG_TEGRA20 also to keep with the new naming? -Allen -- nvpublic