From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:30:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an
	unidentified CPU type
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5C4T4LmoGJnt7GieFK07CiMyVvUBBCnjJseYZtd=Mv9mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1339937889-15538-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
	<CAP9ODKqpBoLZoSyn-vgyehZh4NNBGjeTfh8VrD2Um41OGjiAOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOMZO5C4T4LmoGJnt7GieFK07CiMyVvUBBCnjJseYZtd=Mv9mw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201206171530.17935.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Fabio Estevam,

> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Otavio Salvador
> 
> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>        default:
> >>> -               return "unknown";
> >>> +               return "<unidentified>";
> >> 
> >> I really don't see any improvement here.
> > 
> > It is just to avoid a i.MXunkown return; besides this is how I am
> > doing in the mx23 code too.
> 
> This is OK. If you read "i.MXunkown" things are too broken already
> because the chip version could not be read.
> 
> Reading "i.MX<unidentified>" will make things no better.

This was from my head actually ... and I think this is better. The text is at 
least not mangled so badly. So let's keep it.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut