From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120622131654.2c694a82@aari01-12> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340357816.1381.21.camel@tellur>
Hi Lucas,
> > > Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
> > > reasonable OS to do so.
> >
> > Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does it fix some
> > issue whereby some mis-aligned piece of data cannot be properly
> > aligned?
> >
> Yes, it fixes U-Boot USB on Tegra, when built with a recent toolchain.
> Fixing the alignment of some of the structures in the USB code should
> also be done, but this is a whole lot more invasive and requires some
> more thought, as the discussion about this on LKML shows. The issue
> doesn't show for older toolchains, as they by default emit code to
> work around unaligned accesses.
>
> This patch fixes all unaligned issues, that may appear with recent
> toolchains. We avoid having to instruct the toolchain to work around
> unaligned accesses and gain better performance in cases where it is
> needed.
I am not too happy with enabling a lax behavior only to avoid an
issue which apparently is diagnosed and could / should be fixed at
its root. Can you point me to the relevant LKML thread
so that I get the details and understand what prevents fixing this by
'simply' aligning the USB structures?
> Thanks,
> Lucas
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-22 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 17:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: enable unaligned access on ARMv7 Lucas Stach
2012-06-05 18:42 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 19:06 ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 9:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-22 9:36 ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 11:16 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2012-06-22 11:47 ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-22 22:11 ` Aneesh V
2012-06-22 22:13 ` Aneesh V
2012-06-23 9:01 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-23 17:43 ` V, Aneesh
2012-06-25 20:34 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-06-25 21:49 ` Aneesh V
2012-06-25 22:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-06-23 19:50 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-06-24 6:30 ` Lucas Stach
[not found] ` <20120625221741.3a32790e@lilith>
2012-06-25 21:34 ` Lucas Stach
2012-06-26 20:56 ` Rob Herring
2012-06-27 10:14 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02 9:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: armv7: add compile option -mno-unaligned-access if available Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-02 9:53 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-02 15:16 ` Lucas Stach
2012-07-02 16:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-07-03 7:10 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-05 7:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-18 21:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 4:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19 4:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-19 6:28 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-19 14:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-07-20 7:12 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-12 15:12 ` Gary Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120622131654.2c694a82@aari01-12 \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox