From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:31:13 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add basic support for the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC In-Reply-To: <4FE4FD2F.4010703@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20120622070554.6596d5c5@lilith> <4FE49BEB.1090100@wwwdotorg.org> <20120622163403.2C4D520225A@gemini.denx.de> <4FE49EF4.3040706@wwwdotorg.org> <20120622171429.8481E20225A@gemini.denx.de> <4FE4AB87.1030500@wwwdotorg.org> <20120622181854.399B520225A@gemini.denx.de> <4FE4B9C2.3050001@wwwdotorg.org> <20120622215809.9FE68200151@gemini.denx.de> <4FE4FD2F.4010703@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20120622233113.GD20763@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 05:18:07PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/22/2012 03:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Stephen Warren, > > > > In message <4FE4B9C2.3050001@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote: > >> > >> OK, that's fine; I'll rely solely on patch email then. I just figured on > >> saving Albert some git am work, seeing as how many other single SoCs are > >> handled via git pull already. > > > > Are there? Which for example? > > Tegra does this for sure. There are also u-boot-ti.git, > u-boot-samsung.git, and u-boot-marvell.git that I believe are for the > same purpose. u-boot-ti covers omap3 (and derrivatives), omap4, omap5, am33xx and davinci SoCs. u-boot-samsung also covers a handful of SoCs (at least 3 by a quick count). kirkwood (marvell) also has a number of boards. I think u-boot-tegra is probably the smallest example but that's still 6 boards (and another SoC family trying to get in). Once BCM2835 (or BCM283x or BCM28xx or whatever the generic name would be) reaches that threshold, I imagine Wolfgang would see the need for a custodian repository. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: