[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

Marek Vasut
2012-06-24T13:43:10Z

Dear Fabio Estevam,

> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> But in which way would "<unidentified>" be better than "unknown"? It
> >> just costs 7 more bytes of memory...
> >
> > "i.MXunknown" is much more weird than "i.MX<unidentified>" . This is on
> > my tap,
>
> I think both are equally weird. This message is so rare that I also
> agree that is not worth changing this string, as there is no real gain
> by doing so.

Ok, you got me by majority vote ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut