From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:43:10 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an
	unidentified CPU type
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BCHfo-mz0Dy84xZDWOYU2tqGBxgXHn3SwKsFPq15aF2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1340482108-18468-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
	<201206241508.42858.marex@denx.de>
	<CAOMZO5BCHfo-mz0Dy84xZDWOYU2tqGBxgXHn3SwKsFPq15aF2g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201206241543.10996.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Fabio Estevam,

> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >> But in which way would "<unidentified>" be better than "unknown"?  It
> >> just costs 7 more bytes of memory...
> > 
> > "i.MXunknown" is much more weird than "i.MX<unidentified>" . This is on
> > my tap,
> 
> I think both are equally weird. This message is so rare that I also
> agree that is not worth changing this string, as there is no real gain
> by doing so.

Ok, you got me by majority vote ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut