From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm: bugfix: save_boot_params_default accesses uninitalized stack when -O0
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:10:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120705191048.328459cc@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120705161828.GA10143@bill-the-cat>
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:18:28 -0700, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Tetsuyuki,
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:36:21 +0900, Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
> > <koba@kmckk.co.jp> wrote:
> > > save_boot_params_default() in cpu.c accesses uninitialized stack area
> > > when it compiled with -O0 (not optimized).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi <koba@kmckk.co.jp>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v2:
> > > - include <linux/compiler.h> and use __naked instead of
> > > __attribute__((naked))
> > >
> > > Changes for v3:
> > > - move __naked after void
> > > - reformat comments
> > >
> > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Applied to u-boot-arm/master, thanks.
>
> Oh no...
> cpu.c: In function 'save_boot_params_default':
> cpu.c:48:1: warning: -fstack-usage not supported for this target [enabled by default]
>
> Last time we made a const uint32 out of the instruction instead (see
> 494931a). I don't think that's appropriate here however. Maybe we can
> declare the function weak in assembly instead, then we won't need the
> naked part and won't have this warning.
Meanwhile I'll remove this patch from my tree.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 12:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: bugfix: save_boot_params_default accesses uninitalized stack when -O0 Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-27 17:40 ` Tom Rini
2012-06-28 1:14 ` Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-28 11:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-28 14:57 ` Tom Rini
2012-06-28 16:00 ` koba
2012-06-29 9:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-06-29 14:21 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-05 9:25 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 11:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-05 16:18 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-05 17:10 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2012-07-06 6:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-06 14:00 ` Tom Rini
2012-07-07 7:14 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] " Tetsuyuki Kobayashi
2012-07-09 8:55 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120705191048.328459cc@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox