[U-Boot] [V3] arm: Fix to mistake clean the memory space

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Andreas,

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:21:12 +0200, "Andreas Bie?mann"
<andreas.devel@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear Zhong Hongbo,
> 
> On 07.07.2012 15:19, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
> > On 07/07/2012 05:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >> Hi Zhong Hongbo,
> >>
> >> On Sat,  7 Jul 2012 17:47:16 +0800, Zhong Hongbo
> >> <bocui107@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> From: Zhong Hongbo <bocui107@gmail.com>
> 
> >> Almost there... The PATCH part is missing, i.e. you should not tag
> >> "[V3]" but "[PATCH V3]".
> > 
> > Ok,
> 
> well, you sent v4 but didn't respect this comment. Please read
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions
> especially this part:
> 
> ---8<---
> Make an appropriate note that this is a re-submission in the subject
> line, eg. "[PATCH v2] Add support for feature X". git format-patch
> --subject-prefix="PATCH v2" can be used in this case.
> --->8---
> 
> Another option is to use 'git send-email --annotate ...' and change
> the subject line.
> 
> >> Just to make sure patchwork gets it right, please repost a V4 of
> >> this properly tagged with "[PATCH V4]".
> 
> I think patchwork got it right
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/169595/ and
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/169572/. So I would say you do not
> need to resend a v5 of the same patch cause of this formal 'fault'.
> Albert, do you have the same opinion?

(sigh) No, I don't have the same opinion.

But I will accept... for this once.

> Albert, I think we should count this a fix and pull into this upcoming
> release. How do you think about?

This was my intent from the start. :)

> Best regards
> 
> Andreas Bie?mann

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.