From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: work around assembler bug
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:16:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120710081624.17dd8cf6@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALButCKFosvtCJ=sA=SqcQmrAP_j9rX6n=2WGJTTqOK+1hM_UA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Graeme and Allen,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:13:47 +1000, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > Disable sibling call optimization based on binutils version. This is
> > to work around a bug in the assember in binutils versions < 2.22.
> > Branches to weak symbols can be incorrectly optimized in thumb mode to
> > a short branch (b.n instruction) that won't reach when the symbol gets
> > preempted.
> >
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Allen Martin <amartin@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/config.mk | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/config.mk b/arch/arm/config.mk
> > index 3f4453a..1ba9d75 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/config.mk
> > +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk
> > @@ -87,3 +87,23 @@ endif
> > ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
> > LDFLAGS_u-boot += -pie
> > endif
> > +
> > +#
> > +# binutils versions < 2.22 have a bug in the assembler where branches
> > +# to weak symbols can be incorrectly optimized in thumb mode to a
> > +# short branch (b.n instruction) that won't reach when the symbol
> > +# gets preempted
> > +#
> > +# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
> > +#
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD),y)
> > +ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),)
> > +export GAS_BUG_12532:=$(shell if [ $(call binutils-version) -lt 0222 ] ; then echo yes; else echo no; fi)
>
> y instead of yes
>
> > +ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),yes)
>
> So:
>
> ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),y)
>
> is more consistent
>
> > +$(warning *** disabling sibling call optimzation because binutils version < 2.22)
>
> Maybe add 'code size will be (slightly) larger'
"could be" rather than "will be" ?
>
> > +endif
> > +endif
> > +ifeq ($(GAS_BUG_12532),yes)
> > +PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > +endif
> > +endif
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
If a new patch version is out and Tested-by: soon, I am willing to take this in.
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 5:08 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] tools, config.mk: add binutils-version Allen Martin
2012-07-10 5:08 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: work around assembler bug Allen Martin
2012-07-10 5:13 ` Graeme Russ
2012-07-10 6:16 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120710081624.17dd8cf6@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox