[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Gerlando Falauto]

Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.

Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
board_early_init_f().

Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c   |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
index 181b3e7..d938578 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
 #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_BAR(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1500) + (x * 0x08))
 #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1504) + (x * 0x08))
+
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WR_PROTECT	(1 << 1)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WIN0_CS(x)	(((x) & 0x3) << 2)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(x)	(((x) & 0xff) << 24)
+
 /*
  * kw_sdram_bar - reads SDRAM Base Address Register
  */
@@ -62,6 +68,23 @@ u32 kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank)
 	return result;
 }
 
+/*
+ * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
+ */
+void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)
+{
+	/* Read current register value */
+	u32 reg = readl(KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
+
+	/* Clear window size */
+	reg &= ~KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(0xFF);
+
+	/* Set new window size */
+	reg |= KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE((size - 1) >> 24);
+
+	writel(reg, KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_BOARD_DRAM_INIT
 int dram_init(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
index d28c51a..807154e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ void reset_cpu(unsigned long ignored);
 unsigned char get_random_hex(void);
 unsigned int kw_sdram_bar(enum memory_bank bank);
 unsigned int kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank);
+void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size);
+
 int kw_config_adr_windows(void);
 void kw_config_gpio(unsigned int gpp0_oe_val, unsigned int gpp1_oe_val,
 		unsigned int gpp0_oe, unsigned int gpp1_oe);
-- 
1.7.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] km_arm: enable SDRAM window size fixup

[Gerlando Falauto]

Size of the SDRAM chips might differ between any two (otherwise
identical) instances of the same board.

So change board_early_init_f() to use km_sdram_bs_set(), in order to
fixup the window size register at runtime, according to the detected
SDRAM size.

Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
---
 board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
index cb3402b..d531c08 100644
--- a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
+++ b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
@@ -241,10 +241,22 @@ int misc_init_r(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dram_size_fixup(void)
+{
+	u32 size;
+
+	/* probe currently equipped RAM size */
+	size = get_ram_size((void *)kw_sdram_bar(0), kw_sdram_bs(0));
+
+	/* fixup SDRAM window size accordingly */
+	kw_sdram_bs_set(0, size);
+}
+
 int board_early_init_f(void)
 {
 	u32 tmp;
 
+	dram_size_fixup();
 	kirkwood_mpp_conf(kwmpp_config, NULL);
 
 	/*
-- 
1.7.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Gerlando Falauto,

> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
> be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
> can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.
> 
> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
> board_early_init_f().
> 
[..]

> +/*
> + * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
> + */
> +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)

The enum is declared somewhere, right ?

[...]

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Gerlando Falauto]

On 07/05/2012 05:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Gerlando Falauto,
>
>> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
>> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
>> be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
>> can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.
>>
>> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
>> board_early_init_f().
>>
> [..]
>
>> +/*
>> + * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
>> + */
>> +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)
>
> The enum is declared somewhere, right ?
Yes, in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h.

It's the same enum also used by other functions {declared, defined} 
within the same {header, source} file, like:

u32 kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank)

Best regards,
Gerlando

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Gerlando Falauto,

> On 07/05/2012 05:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Gerlando Falauto,
> > 
> >> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
> >> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
> >> be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
> >> can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.
> >> 
> >> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
> >> board_early_init_f().
> > 
> > [..]
> > 
> >> +/*
> >> + * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
> >> + */
> >> +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)
> > 
> > The enum is declared somewhere, right ?
> 
> Yes, in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h.
> 
> It's the same enum also used by other functions {declared, defined}
> within the same {header, source} file, like:
> 
> u32 kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank)

Good, add my

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>

> 
> Best regards,
> Gerlando

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Gerlando Falauto]

Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.

Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
board_early_init_f().

Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
---
changes for v2:
added Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>

 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c   |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
index 181b3e7..d938578 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 
 #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_BAR(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1500) + (x * 0x08))
 #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1504) + (x * 0x08))
+
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WR_PROTECT	(1 << 1)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WIN0_CS(x)	(((x) & 0x3) << 2)
+#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(x)	(((x) & 0xff) << 24)
+
 /*
  * kw_sdram_bar - reads SDRAM Base Address Register
  */
@@ -62,6 +68,23 @@ u32 kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank)
 	return result;
 }
 
+/*
+ * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
+ */
+void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)
+{
+	/* Read current register value */
+	u32 reg = readl(KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
+
+	/* Clear window size */
+	reg &= ~KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(0xFF);
+
+	/* Set new window size */
+	reg |= KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE((size - 1) >> 24);
+
+	writel(reg, KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_BOARD_DRAM_INIT
 int dram_init(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
index d28c51a..807154e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ void reset_cpu(unsigned long ignored);
 unsigned char get_random_hex(void);
 unsigned int kw_sdram_bar(enum memory_bank bank);
 unsigned int kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank);
+void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size);
+
 int kw_config_adr_windows(void);
 void kw_config_gpio(unsigned int gpp0_oe_val, unsigned int gpp1_oe_val,
 		unsigned int gpp0_oe, unsigned int gpp1_oe);
-- 
1.7.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Gerlando Falauto,

> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size) should
> be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
> can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.
> 
> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance within
> board_early_init_f().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
> Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
> ---
> changes for v2:
> added Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
[...]

You don't have to resend it, patchwork does this additions for us :)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerlando Falauto [mailto:gerlando.falauto at keymile.com]
> Sent: 06 July 2012 17:20
> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Gerlando Falauto; Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk; Valentin
> Longchamp; Holger Brunck
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()
> 
> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM configurations.
> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size)
> should
> be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then its value
> can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM size.
> 
> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance
> within
> board_early_init_f().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
> Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
> ---
> changes for v2:
> added Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c   |   23
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> index 181b3e7..d938578 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> 
>  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_BAR(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1500) + (x *
> 0x08))
>  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1504) + (x *
> 0x08))

Hi Gerlando
I have a full ack for this patch.
But I would like to ask you-
Since dram.c is going through this change and macros are being used in stead of c-struct for DRAM register variables.
This is being one of the todo item pending from long time.

Would you like to convert macros to c-struct definition in this file?
  
> +
> +#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
> +#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WR_PROTECT	(1 << 1)
> +#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_WIN0_CS(x)	(((x) & 0x3) << 2)
> +#define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(x)	(((x) & 0xff) << 24)
> +
>  /*
>   * kw_sdram_bar - reads SDRAM Base Address Register
>   */
> @@ -62,6 +68,23 @@ u32 kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank)
>  	return result;
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * kw_sdram_bs_set - writes SDRAM Bank size
> + */
> +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size)
> +{
> +	/* Read current register value */
> +	u32 reg = readl(KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
> +
> +	/* Clear window size */
> +	reg &= ~KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE(0xFF);
> +
> +	/* Set new window size */
> +	reg |= KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SIZE((size - 1) >> 24);
> +
> +	writel(reg, KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(bank));
> +}
> +
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_BOARD_DRAM_INIT
>  int dram_init(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> index d28c51a..807154e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ void reset_cpu(unsigned long ignored);
>  unsigned char get_random_hex(void);
>  unsigned int kw_sdram_bar(enum memory_bank bank);
>  unsigned int kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank);
> +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size);
> +

Please remove this additional line

>  int kw_config_adr_windows(void);
>  void kw_config_gpio(unsigned int gpp0_oe_val, unsigned int
> gpp1_oe_val,
>  		unsigned int gpp0_oe, unsigned int gpp1_oe);
> --

Regards...
Prafulla . . .

> 1.7.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,

[...]

> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> > index 181b3e7..d938578 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> > 
> >  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_BAR(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1500) + (x *
> > 
> > 0x08))
> > 
> >  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1504) + (x *
> > 
> > 0x08))
> 
> Hi Gerlando
> I have a full ack for this patch.
> But I would like to ask you-
> Since dram.c is going through this change and macros are being used in
> stead of c-struct for DRAM register variables. This is being one of the
> todo item pending from long time.
> 
> Would you like to convert macros to c-struct definition in this file?

Certainly, but let's get this applied first.

[...]

> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> > index d28c51a..807154e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h
> > @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ void reset_cpu(unsigned long ignored);
> > 
> >  unsigned char get_random_hex(void);
> >  unsigned int kw_sdram_bar(enum memory_bank bank);
> >  unsigned int kw_sdram_bs(enum memory_bank bank);
> > 
> > +void kw_sdram_bs_set(enum memory_bank bank, u32 size);
> > +
> 
> Please remove this additional line

Well, maybe you can remove it in the application process since it's really one 
small thing?

> >  int kw_config_adr_windows(void);
> >  void kw_config_gpio(unsigned int gpp0_oe_val, unsigned int
> > 
> > gpp1_oe_val,
> > 
> >  		unsigned int gpp0_oe, unsigned int gpp1_oe);
> > 
> > --
> 
> Regards...
> Prafulla . . .
> 
> > 1.7.1

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Holger Brunck]

Hi Marek, hi Prafulla,

On 07/20/2012 01:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
>>> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
>>> index 181b3e7..d938578 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/dram.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>
>>>  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_BAR(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1500) + (x *
>>>
>>> 0x08))
>>>
>>>  #define KW_REG_CPUCS_WIN_SZ(x)		(KW_REGISTER(0x1504) + (x *
>>>
>>> 0x08))
>>
>> Hi Gerlando
>> I have a full ack for this patch.
>> But I would like to ask you-
>> Since dram.c is going through this change and macros are being used in
>> stead of c-struct for DRAM register variables. This is being one of the
>> todo item pending from long time.
>>
>> Would you like to convert macros to c-struct definition in this file?
> 
> Certainly, but let's get this applied first.
> 
> [...]
> 

I have done a v3 version of this patchserie with Prafullas inputs. Gerlando is
not in these days.

I'll send the updates soon... I have already tested them on km_kirkwood.

Regards
Holger

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] km_arm: enable SDRAM window size fixup

[Gerlando Falauto]

Size of the SDRAM chips might differ between any two (otherwise
identical) instances of the same board.

So change board_early_init_f() to use km_sdram_bs_set(), in order to
fixup the window size register at runtime, according to the detected
SDRAM size.

Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
---
changes for v2:
- rebase to current u-boot-marvell.git master branch

 board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
index 2b2ca39..24cf6c7 100644
--- a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
+++ b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
@@ -241,6 +241,17 @@ int misc_init_r(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dram_size_fixup(void)
+{
+	u32 size;
+
+	/* probe currently equipped RAM size */
+	size = get_ram_size((void *)kw_sdram_bar(0), kw_sdram_bs(0));
+
+	/* fixup SDRAM window size accordingly */
+	kw_sdram_bs_set(0, size);
+}
+
 int board_early_init_f(void)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_SOFT_I2C)
@@ -251,6 +262,7 @@ int board_early_init_f(void)
 	writel(tmp & (~KM_KIRKWOOD_SOFT_I2C_GPIOS) , KW_GPIO0_BASE + 4);
 #endif
 
+	dram_size_fixup();
 	kirkwood_mpp_conf(kwmpp_config, NULL);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] km_arm: enable SDRAM window size fixup

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Gerlando Falauto
> Sent: 06 July 2012 17:20
> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Valentin Longchamp; Holger Brunck; Gerlando Falauto
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] km_arm: enable SDRAM window size
> fixup
> 
> Size of the SDRAM chips might differ between any two (otherwise
> identical) instances of the same board.
> 
> So change board_early_init_f() to use km_sdram_bs_set(), in order to
> fixup the window size register at runtime, according to the detected
> SDRAM size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
> Cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com>
> Cc: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
> ---
> changes for v2:
> - rebase to current u-boot-marvell.git master branch
> 
>  board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> index 2b2ca39..24cf6c7 100644
> --- a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> +++ b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> @@ -241,6 +241,17 @@ int misc_init_r(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static void dram_size_fixup(void)

The name "fixup" doesn't sound good.

> +{
> +	u32 size;
> +
> +	/* probe currently equipped RAM size */
> +	size = get_ram_size((void *)kw_sdram_bar(0), kw_sdram_bs(0));
> +
> +	/* fixup SDRAM window size accordingly */
> +	kw_sdram_bs_set(0, size);
> +}
> +

This is useful API for other boards too.
I would like to suggest to add this change in dram_init(), the window size can be corrected right after sdram size detection. And that will be applicable for all supported bank.

So may you please push in to dram.c?

Regards...
Prafulla . . .