From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:14:53 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12 In-Reply-To: <20120723205354.GE8985@bill-the-cat> References: <201207211640.27316.marex@denx.de> <20120723205354.GE8985@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <201207240014.53506.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Tom Rini, > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > [snip] > > > The other problem is how to find the boards that actually need rebuild on > > per- patch basis. And for generic patches, we'll need to do MAKEALL > > across all architectures anyway, which takes a bit of time. > > I think we (custodians) need to define representative sets. For TI > stuff, you don't need to hit every omap3 board, but just a handful to be > good enough. And while my PowerPC is rusty, I know we don't need to > build as many combinations of boards as we do to be happy in an > every-patch build (just nightly / once there's changes live on wd's > master branch would be the world). Good idea ... USB is generally properly isolated part, yet it can impact crazy boards, like MPC83xx (well, I still have my shallow grave around, which I left just by WD's sheer grace ;-) ). Best regards, Marek Vasut